Tag Archives: building schools for the future

Mark Valladares

29 June 2020 – the overnight press release

By Mark Valladares | Mon 29th June 2020 - 7:30 am

Govt funding for schools is spin over substance

Responding to the Government’s announcement of a ten-year rebuilding programme schools, Liberal Democrat Education spokesperson Layla Moran said:

This is spin over substance. The funding is nowhere near the £7bn the National Audit Office has said is needed to repair our schools.

Schools need urgent investment to increase space now, not vague numbers pulled out of thin air.

Whether it’s investing in schools or hospitals, time and again the Conservatives have over promised and under delivered.

Posted in News | Also tagged | 2 Comments
Stephen Tall

5 points on Clegg’s admission that Coalition was wrong to cut capital spending

By Stephen Tall | Fri 25th January 2013 - 8:40 am

Nick Clegg in DublinNick Clegg has sparked a flurry of excitement with his admission in an interview for The House magazine that the Coalition cut capital spending ‘too far, too fast’ to coin a phrase. Here’s what he said to Paul Waugh and Sam Macrory:

“If I’m going to be sort of self-critical, there was this reduction in capital spending when we came into the Coalition Government. I think we comforted ourselves at the time that it was actually no more than what Alistair Darling spelt out

…

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , , and | 45 Comments
Ed Fordham

Opinion: BSF is dead – thank goodness‏

By Ed Fordham | Thu 16th September 2010 - 10:30 am

With the Conference season now upon us and with Labour preparing to crown their new Leader it seems appropriate that we lay to rest the myth that BSF (Building Schools for the Future) was some great effective scheme. In fact it was a bureaucratic joke with too few beneficiaries and huge expensive processes. The Liberal Democrat Conference is a good chance to cheer and toast the end of BSF and focus on education and pupils and real improvements.

It was 2005 and the local elections in London were scheduled for 2006. It was clear, we were clear, parents were clear, that there was a need for additional secondary school places in north west London in the Borough of Camden. The case for more places in the south of the Borough was also compelling – the campaign for a school ‘south of the Euston Road’ was pretty noisy and indeed compelling. And yet Camden Council had got itself to a place whereby it looked inactive, unable to articulate a more pro-active vision and lacking the political leadership to secure a new school.

I remember very clearly the conversation in Cllr Keith Moffitt’s front room in West Hampstead about the need for a new school.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 6 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • PM
    @ Russell, "EU migrants were net contributors to the treasury whereas non EU migrants were a drain." Would you care to elaborate on this? Ar...
  • Russell
    The unavoidable "bottom line" is that EU migrants were net contributors to the treasury whereas non EU migrants were a drain....
  • Tristan Ward
    If Britain is to join the EU (or even the Single Market/a new Customs Union) there has to be a broad consensus across the political spectrum. That means ther...
  • Mick Taylor
    My recollection is that the constitution gives control over voting to the states, so there would be no federal intervention possible....
  • Peter Davies
    "Please Democrats – where you now control state legislatures – reverse the suppression and the gerrymandering." Of course they should and probably will do t...