Tag Archives: For a Fair Deal

We need to champion radical and avant-garde policies

The Lib Dems are bumbling along at the lower end of the polls at about 12% of the vote. Reform UK and the Greens are lapping at their heels, and if the Libs Dems are not careful, they will be eclipsed by one or both of them. Both Tories and Labour are in disarray, but in spite of this, the Lib Dems are making no headway. All they are doing is just scooping up the protest vote. Why is this? It is because they have no imaginative policies.

I have studied the policy paper, For a Fair Deal. It is fine as far as it goes, but a bit limp. It is full of targets, without any explanation on how they are to be achieved. In its core is a contradiction. As large an elephant in the room as anyone might find. On page ten we state that, with the exception of emergencies, we will balance the budget, but on twenty-one other occasions we commit ourselves to investments, without showing how they will be funded. It would be fine if we are applying Keynesian economics, the jewel in the crown of the Liberal armoury, but we do not.

Posted in Op-eds | 52 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • David S
    Here's something to be learnt from Brexit: For Parliament to vote to have a referendum isn't just a vote to schedule and set up an election. A vote to hav...
  • Jeff
    nigel hunter 1st Jul '26 - 10:32pm: WH Smith sold its shops off and they were rebranded. Now the USA private equity company are selling them off afte...
  • Francis Chubb
    The advantages of this approach are: (1) the Citizens' Assembly (or its alternative) can consider all the points that the commission would look at - indeed, it ...
  • Francis Chubb
    I am very glad to see this article, as I have been hoping that our Lib Dem MPs will find a way to help get Andy Burnham to move on proportional representation s...
  • Graham Jeffs
    I have much sympathy with this article. Consistently over the past year or two many of us have been urging the party to promote our belief in Liberalism, not...