Tag Archives: lib dems at 30

The reason Tim Farron didn’t vote for merger

Ten years ago, the lib dem blogfather Jonathan Calder wrote an article for the New Statesman about the party’s first 20 years.

But if Liberal enthusiasts for merger were to have their hopes crushed, Liberal sceptics were to be confounded too. There were many who feared the new party would see Liberalism submerged within Social Democracy or junked in an enthusiasm for all things new.

He shared it on Twitter yesterday, saying that he had been one of the Liberal Party members who had opposed the merger.

His tweet prompted a confession from Tim Farron:

I actually came to the new party from the SDP. I had been very much in favour of merger and told Bob Maclennan so in no uncertain terms on the day after the disappointing 1987 election.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 9 Comments

Lib Dems at 30 – let’s be bold, confident and radical

It’s a wee while since I hit 30 but I’ve been thinking a lot about how I felt at that time in my life.

My twenties had been pretty turbulent in many ways and had taught me quite a bit about the world and how it works and where things needed to change.

By the time I hit 30, I not only felt surer of myself, I felt more impatient even than I had at 16 to change the world. Why? Because so little had changed. Because we were still having the same arguments about power being concentrated in the hands of too few white men. Because opportunities for progress were being missed.

It’s a bit the same for the party. When it hit 20, it had 63 MPs and was in many ways at the height of its powers. Charles had been right on Iraq, Vince had been right about the financial crash which was only just starting to unfold. Actually, Paddy, our leader for the first 10 years had been right on social justice, right on Kosovo, right on Hong Kong.

As we hit 30, we are still right on the big issues of the day – housing, Brexit, inequality, climate change. We are much smaller in terms of MPs and councillors, but we have more members than we had 10 years ago. We had about 75000 members around the time Nick Clegg won in 2007. We broke the 100,000 barrier last year.

It is not easy being a third party in a bonkers electoral system that is built for two who want to keep it that way.  It wasn’t until our 10th year that we broke through, doubling our number of MPs to 46. It wasn’t until our 11th year that we had nationwide representation in the European Parliament. 

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 20 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Martin Pierce
    I think Ed should be worried if Caron is saying this. She is not quick to temper on such matters. As others have said though, my worry is not so much that Ed is...
  • Hywel
    Tim Farron said "most polls suggest we’ll hold or even add to those record numbers of MPs" In fact not one MRP this year has shown an increased number of L...
  • Sarah
    Ed should take the frustration and stagnation of the party as a sign and do the honorable thing. He should announce a leadership election in the new year that h...
  • David Raw
    There's a much bigger question than "Is Ed Davey toast ?" The real underlying question is whether the Liberal Democrat Party can articulate radical convinci...
  • Chloe
    I'm suggesting as Nigel has written on the previous post. Jam tomorrow - possibly , maybe, doubtful given the growth stats. It's fantasy stuff the figures being...