Tag Archives: referendum on brexit deal

People’s vote: the vital importance of preferential voting

The possibility/probability of a people’s vote seems to be increasing.

Minds are starting to be focussed on what would be on the ballot paper in such a referendum. A good guess seems to be:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 32 Comments

“Brexit is not inevitable. It can be stopped.” – People’s Vote march: ‘700,000’ rally for new Brexit referendum

Here’s a selection of other tweets from today’s march:

Posted in News | Also tagged | 9 Comments

Lib Dem Amendment for people’s vote on Brexit deal defeated

Last night, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 120 of the EU Withdrawal Bill, whether people should be given a vote on the final Brexit deal.

It was defeated, with 23 for and 319 against – most of Labour didn’t vote!

You can watch Wera Hobhouse’s passionate speech for giving people a say on the Brexit deal here.

And Tom Brake’s speech here.

Commenting on the vote, LibDem Brexit Spokesperson Tom Brake said:

This is a shameful showing from the Labour party. They are meant to be opposing the government, but instead they

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged and | 19 Comments

Momentum builds behind Brexit deal referendum

We shouldn’t assume that our failure to break through in the General Election means that people don’t agree with our policy on a referendum on the Brexit deal.

Polling is consistently showing that a majority of people are coming round to that position. For that reason, it would be unwise for us to ditch it.

A Survation poll carried out less than two weeks ago found that 53% of those who expressed a preference favoured a further referendum.

A poll of Scots for STV similarly showed that 61% of those polled said they wanted to see a referendum on the deal. This is particularly interesting given that 70% didn’t want a referendum on independence at the moment. It is significant, though, that 22% of those want to wait and see what happens with Brexit, so that argument isn’t entirely over.

Over at the Huffington Post, Tom Brake set out the case to continue wth our policy on a second referendum:

I do not agree with the view that we should just remain silent during the negotiating process and accept any deal the Government comes up with. This issue is far too important to give the Government a blank cheque. This is like saying that after a general election we should just accept and rubber stamp all decisions until the next election, without holding the Government to account.

I believe, even more strongly than a year ago, that just as people were able to vote for departure from the EU, they should be given a vote on our destination in our future relationship with the EU.

If the process started with a referendum, why shouldn’t it end with another one?

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 23 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHelen Dudden 21st Feb - 10:30am
    I would leave it in the hands of those, who know more about the subject. Like many others, I have said no.
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 21st Feb - 10:27am
    @ expats, I don't doubt Heidi Allen's sincerity, I said nothing about her judgement. She is relatively new to politics and probably did not have...
  • User AvatarMichael Romberg 21st Feb - 10:14am
    If Brexit happens, the vagueness and non-binding nature of the political declaration means that it's all to play for on the future relationship. No point...
  • User Avatarexpats 21st Feb - 10:02am
    David Raw 20th Feb '19 - 10:15pm.............Well, expats, just for once we’ll have to disagree..... No problem, David. We, and Jayne, agree on far more...
  • User AvatarSandra Hammett 21st Feb - 10:01am
    Serious question: Could any ardent Coaltion apologists explain to me why those now in the Independent group didn't join the LibDems? What possible issues can...
  • User AvatarPaul Hunt 21st Feb - 9:58am
    These are very wise words from Richard. The SDP, launched in March 1981, did not field candidates in the May 1981 County Council elections (although...