Tag Archives: retaliatory evictions

Baroness Cathy Bakewell writes… Lib Dem Lords act to stop retaliatory evictions

Yesterday, we moved forward in protecting vulnerable tenants by protecting them from the questionable practice of retaliatory evictions. This is the culmination of a process started by Sarah Teather MP on 28th November when she secured a private Members Bill on Tenancies (Reform) to deal with the problems caused by Retaliatory Evictions.  Sadly there were members in the Commons that day who were themselves landlords, did not share the ethos of the Bill and talked it out of time.  So it was a great privilege for Lib Dems in the Lords to be able to support the essence of Sarah’s Bill in the amendment we debated yesterday. Sarah Teather deserves a lot of credit for her efforts to end this pointless suffering. And for the work she did in the commons to stand up to right wing Tories all too willing to see this continue.

The amendment is not about penalising conscientious landlords, nor is it about protecting bad tenants who do not respect the property they are renting.  It is about protecting the rights of both groups and giving security to tenants, who when reporting a fault which affects their ability to live happily in their home, will not dread an eviction notice landing on the doormat as a result.  It gives a clear signal to those landlords who currently ignore the state of their properties, that this is no longer acceptable.  If such landlords engage in a regular programme of maintenance, they are likely to have a much better relationship with their tenants, reduce the incidence of costly tenancy turnover and be less likely to face expensive repair bills for major incidents, such as collapsed ceilings due to persistent leaks.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • Russell L Simpson
    @ Fiona Interesting. So, in reality, your union didn't abstain. Presumably they knew that by abstaining they were voting for fptp. Not so much democracy in evi...
  • Jayne Mansfield
    @ David Raw, Apologies. I had forgotten you had mentioned the King David Version of the Bible, Matthew 12:25. Division certainly gave us the current vers...
  • Jayne Mansfield
    @Peter Martin, Are you working for the Conservative Party? It sounds as if some heads need knocking together, (metaphorically speaking may I add). If the...
  • Simon R
    Thanks for the explanation @Mark Valladares. The whole issue of sexual identity is a very difficult and emotive topic, and I really don't envy you guys having ...
  • Simon R
    I don't think it's correct to largely blame Beeching or rail privatisation for the high proportion of freight transported by lorries. At the time of Beeching, t...