Tag Archives: roger liddle

Fighting Brexit: The virtues of patience

Few presentations have challenged my thinking more than Roger Liddle’s talk at the meeting of the Social Democrat Group, reported earlier on LDV. Delivered with an almost Churchillian eloquence, it set out why a long term perspective may pay off in the end.

The clever thing about the two year transition period requested by Theresa May, he points out, is that it renders the exit itself painless. By means of this “Brexit now, pay later” ploy, the huge cost is kicked well into the future and the electorate robbed of an immediate reason to protest. But the good news, Liddle believes, is that rejoining the EU should be a feasible proposition when the country finally wakes up.

But we must stop Brexit now! That was the reaction of subsequent speakers. And indeed, I myself have emphasised the urgency for a second vote. We have nothing to lose, have we? Yes we have, says Liddle, because if we lost two referendums in a row, our long term prospects would be even worse.

And there is a high risk of such a defeat because referendums are inherently treacherous.

Furthermore we are severely outgunned. Much has been made of encouraging signs that the tide is turning, but the significant statistic about Brexit is that despite being unmitigated twaddle and a piece of criminal insanity, almost half the population still believe in it. That is, in large measure, testament to the success of the Brextremist propaganda machine – our rightwing press.

They were emboldened by their win last time, and are now cruising smugly along, so we are apt to forget their power. But the minute they sniff a referendum brewing you can bet they will go into overdrive.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 56 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    If Britain is to join the EU (or even the Single Market/a new Customs Union) there has to be a broad consensus across the political spectrum. That means ther...
  • Mick Taylor
    My recollection is that the constitution gives control over voting to the states, so there would be no federal intervention possible....
  • Peter Davies
    "Please Democrats – where you now control state legislatures – reverse the suppression and the gerrymandering." Of course they should and probably will do t...
  • Martin Pierce
    Not mentioned much is the appalling voter suppression in Mississippi. 230,000 taken off the voter rolls earlier this year, strangely but completely coincidental...
  • cim
    I expect the answer is as simple as the Greens (and to a lesser extent the Lib Dems) were benefiting from the "Starmer is so terrible we can't vote Labour any m...