Tag Archives: second referendum

Words of warning on a Second Referendum

I have been a member of the Liberal Democrats for nearly a year now and a supporter since about 2012. I respect the party’s decision to advocate a second referendum in order to give Britain the opportunity to remain. Since the PM came back with her deal, I’ve put a lot of thought into whether to personally support a second referendum or not and have concluded that as a party we are playing with fire, a fire that will catch to a tinder dry nation and isn’t something we’re going to be able to control. Even if you disagree with …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 53 Comments

Vince Cable calls for an “adjudicator” in any Brexit deal referendum, plus votes for 16 and 17 year olds


In a speech to the North East of England People’s Vote rally in Newcastle this afternoon, Liberal Democrat Leader Vince Cable said:

Some say a People’s Vote would cause aggro, all the lies of 2016 would be repeated. We need to anticipate that. We need an adjudicator who can look at what campaigners say and fact check them properly.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 27 Comments

The dangers of the ‘people’s vote’

As the Chequers agreement and White Paper evince, the details of the interim package on offer are highly complicated. Submitting the terms and conditions of the Article 50 negotiations to a popular vote would be fraudulent. A referendum would be unlikely to elucidate the pros and cons of the Facilitated Customs Arrangement, the future of the City of London or the Irish backstop protocol. Rather, the hapless voter would face the same dilemma as vacillating parliamentarians – namely, a crude and invidious choice between the government’s Brexit deal and the cliff edge.

Ms. Miller & co make two gigantic misjudgments. The first is that, in the event of a referendum rejecting the Barnier package, the EU would be prepared to open up a new negotiation under Article 50 or to suspend Article 50 until the Brits sort themselves out. Having offered Cameron one new settlement for Britain in 2016 and May another in 2018, toleration of the British will be at an end. There will be no third negotiation. So what would be the referendum question? Moreover, on which side would Lib Dems be campaigning?

The second big mistake is to assume that the Remainers would ‘win’ the second referendum no matter the question. Opinion polls suggest that the outcome would be just as close as the first: certainly the assumption that Remain would win handsomely and settle the business of Britain’s place in Europe is an arrogant one, not supported by the facts.

Posted in News and Op-eds | Also tagged | 102 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael 1 22nd Apr - 3:57pm
    @John Marriott Certainly the SDP split from Labour, along with a big lurch of Labour to the left (which prompted the split) at a time...
  • User AvatarMike Read 22nd Apr - 3:42pm
    expats, If you look at the results of the local by-elections taken place so far this year (from electionmaps), the Lib Dems have won 21%...
  • User AvatarRichard Elliott 22nd Apr - 3:37pm
    Much negative comment on your prospects and against change uk, but we should recognise that Change UK are establishing their brand and welcome the fact...
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 22nd Apr - 3:33pm
    Cassie and frankie, I was shocked to hear that you fell for that propaganda and were duped into voting Leave. What's that? You weren't? You...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 22nd Apr - 3:27pm
    I welcomed the new TIG launch, then, Change UK. I am not tribal. I suggested we relaunch, rebrand years before, under Tim's leadership. I liked...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 22nd Apr - 2:58pm
    I don't see why Lib Dems should be 'embarrassed' at all, John Marriott, if we are obliged to participate in the Euro elections - the...