Tag Archives: second referendum

Words of warning on a Second Referendum

I have been a member of the Liberal Democrats for nearly a year now and a supporter since about 2012. I respect the party’s decision to advocate a second referendum in order to give Britain the opportunity to remain. Since the PM came back with her deal, I’ve put a lot of thought into whether to personally support a second referendum or not and have concluded that as a party we are playing with fire, a fire that will catch to a tinder dry nation and isn’t something we’re going to be able to control. Even if you disagree with …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 53 Comments

Vince Cable calls for an “adjudicator” in any Brexit deal referendum, plus votes for 16 and 17 year olds


In a speech to the North East of England People’s Vote rally in Newcastle this afternoon, Liberal Democrat Leader Vince Cable said:

Some say a People’s Vote would cause aggro, all the lies of 2016 would be repeated. We need to anticipate that. We need an adjudicator who can look at what campaigners say and fact check them properly.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 27 Comments

The dangers of the ‘people’s vote’

As the Chequers agreement and White Paper evince, the details of the interim package on offer are highly complicated. Submitting the terms and conditions of the Article 50 negotiations to a popular vote would be fraudulent. A referendum would be unlikely to elucidate the pros and cons of the Facilitated Customs Arrangement, the future of the City of London or the Irish backstop protocol. Rather, the hapless voter would face the same dilemma as vacillating parliamentarians – namely, a crude and invidious choice between the government’s Brexit deal and the cliff edge.

Ms. Miller & co make two gigantic misjudgments. The first is that, in the event of a referendum rejecting the Barnier package, the EU would be prepared to open up a new negotiation under Article 50 or to suspend Article 50 until the Brits sort themselves out. Having offered Cameron one new settlement for Britain in 2016 and May another in 2018, toleration of the British will be at an end. There will be no third negotiation. So what would be the referendum question? Moreover, on which side would Lib Dems be campaigning?

The second big mistake is to assume that the Remainers would ‘win’ the second referendum no matter the question. Opinion polls suggest that the outcome would be just as close as the first: certainly the assumption that Remain would win handsomely and settle the business of Britain’s place in Europe is an arrogant one, not supported by the facts.

Posted in News and Op-eds | Also tagged | 102 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 6th Dec - 10:18am
    Peter The referendum quite correctly gave an in or out choice. The leave campaign was about taking back control. That means leaving all EU regulated...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 6th Dec - 10:05am
    It would be good to get this thread back to its core topic, the way this election reveals the appalling distortions of our voting system....
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 6th Dec - 9:49am
    @Ross McLean - JLM are an avowedly pro-Zionist organisation. For an alternative view, see https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/statement/rebuttals/
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 6th Dec - 9:32am
    John Marriott I shall always remember the comments when the Coalition government was formed, like “We didn’t vote for this” or “The Lib Dems are...
  • User AvatarAndy Hyde 6th Dec - 9:04am
    John Hall: I think it was the Heath government in the early 70’s who introduced STV for NI local elections, not Thatcher. This was after...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 6th Dec - 8:57am
    If the polls are to be believed, and there really is doubt this time, then we appear to be back to two party politics. Certainly,...
Tue 10th Dec 2019