Tag Archives: spare room subsidy

Opinion: Is the rethink on the Bedroom Tax too little, too late?

Clegg axe bedroom taxThe Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy (the ‘bedroom tax’) has not met its intended outcomes. This has led to an apparent U-turn by the Liberal Democrat leadership, based on evidence published in the interim policy evaluation. This report highlighted the economic hardship experienced by those affected and that the accelerated demand for downsizing has been difficult to meet.

It is to be applauded that Liberal Democrats appear to have responded to evidence which suggests that the policy isn’t working. Also to be welcomed is the intention to …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 42 Comments

Opinion: Don’t close spare room subsidy loophole – just yet

In January, it was revealed that there was a loophole in the Government’s welfare reforms. The loophole relates to those people claiming Housing Benefit whilst in the same property for at least the past 17 years.

The government have indicated they will reverse this loophole as soon as possible. Reports suggest legislation will be brought forward in March.

I would call on the government to hold on closing this loophole until the independent review, ordered by Nick Clegg, has reported back on the implications of the spare bedroom subsidy.

I base this on my own experiences. Although I lost my seat in May

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 5 Comments

Lord German writes… Monitoring the removal of the spare room subsidy

Like many people reading the front page of the Guardian this morning, I was worried by the headline on the pronouncements by the UN special rapporteur on the removal of the spare room subsidy. But it is important to look behind the headline to see that these comments were based on a very brief visit from this adviser, who did not have the time for a detailed discussion with the Department for Work and Pensions to understand the policy. If she had done she would have been able to understand that this policy brings the rules for the social …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 33 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    nvelope2003: You should perhaps read David Warren's comment. It wasn't a matter of a "colourful private life" but the way he treats women that's cause for conce...
  • Alex Macfie
    Michael 1: Apart from the arithmetical error (4.7% going down to 3% is not half), what makes you think a third (as it actually is, approximately) of the Lib Dem...
  • Michael 1
    @nvelope2003 Article 24 of the Lib Dem constitution outlines how the Liberal Democrats would act in the event of "Support for a government which contains ot...
  • Michael 1
    @Simon Hebditch Thanks for your comment. The Labour party didn't advise its supporters to vote Liberal Democrat in Chesham and Amersham - although clearly...
  • Simon Hebditch
    As a supporter of the so-called progressive alliance, I welcome the Lib Dem victory in Chesham and Amersham. Clearly, thousands of Labour voters decided to supp...