Tag Archives: spring conference 2013

The state of the party as we head to Brighton for Spring Conference

By the time you read this, I’ll be in London, no doubt bleary eyed after a night on the sleeper, on my way to Spring Conference in Brighton. I’ve been thinking about how we are as we gather at the seaside. It’s been an eventful six months but has the good outweighed the bad?

Things to smile about

Since we met in Brighton, our ministers in the Coalition Government have done some excellent things. Here’s just a selection:

  • Plans for shared parental leave announced;
  • Equal (ish) marriage Bill unveiled;
  • Stopping the Tories capping Child Benefit at 2 children and taking Housing Benefit off

Posted in Conference and Op-eds | Also tagged | 3 Comments

That ‘jewelry tax’ proposal

Jewellery shot for RK Jewellers 01“Now they want to tax jewellery: New Lib Dem wealth plan to target ALL assets” screamed a headline in the Mail on Sunday yesterday, warning their readers of the latest appalling imposition that Lib Dems in government were about to put upon the public.

“Families will be forced to pay tax on jewellery and other heirlooms under controversial new plans drawn up by the Liberal Democrats. Under the scheme, tax inspectors would get unprecedented new powers to go into homes and value rings, necklaces, paintings, furniture and other family treasures.” they said. If you really want to, read the full article here.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 21 Comments

Caron’s pick of the Federal Spring Conference agenda

Spring 2013 Federal Conference agendaIt’s just over three weeks until Liberal Democrats gather in Brighton for our annual Federal Spring Conference. This morning the agenda landed on my doorstep and I thought I’d share my highlights with you.

If you can, it’s worth trying to get there for 3 pm on Friday 8th March for the consultation sessions. This is an important part of the policy making process, where ordinary party members can have their say as policy documents are being written. Most of them are on issues which apply to the …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 3 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 19th Nov - 10:00am
    Catherine Jane Crosland, you are right about my imperfect choice of words, but please distinguish between my overall scenario, which is hopefully, among some minor...
  • User AvatarBrianD 19th Nov - 9:12am
    Blair is trying to help people and he is spending his own money (presumably from lucrative lectures) doing it. Surely any self respecting liberal would...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Nov - 9:02am
    Arnold, I really must take issue with your claim that the EU is "the only force still defending freedom, modernity, civility, decency and the rule...
  • User AvatarDavid Lowrence 19th Nov - 8:47am
    "And that is why people voted for Kennedy in 2005, Clegg in 2010 and now Corbyn." None of whom ever achieved a majority.
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Nov - 8:30am
    Katharine, I think when Arnold used the word "phantasy" he meant to suggest "vision" or "dream". The difference between the words is interesting. It could...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 19th Nov - 8:18am
    Thank you Katharine, for your kind words. You seem to have detected some limits to my second-language skills: I should have used the term imagination...