Tag Archives: tribalism

Tribalism and party splits

Extraordinary circumstances force us to address hard questions. And the situation in British politics at the beginning of 2019 is the most extraordinary I can recall since I joined the Liberal Party 59 years ago. Both major parties are bitterly divided, with some long-term members talking almost openly of leaving for some other group. Neither of their leaders commands popular respect. Normal government has almost ground to a standstill, with ministers and officials overwhelmed by the uncertainties of Brexit. Either or both Labour and the Tories may find MPs, Councillors and activists splitting away.

Which raises, for …

Posted in Op-eds | 33 Comments

Tribal politics and liberalism – the fight to the death

I have a slightly irrational aversion to holding up diamonds, wearing rosettes and beginning sentences with the phrase “Only the Liberal Democrats”. In fact I canvass now with a badge I had made which says on it against a yellow background “Bloody Politicians”. 

I really,really do get the importance of branding etc but I do think that the future of Liberalism depends on the death of tribal politics.

We are living in strange times where political discourse is often reduced to the exchange of insults, declaration of tribal belief and parodying of alternative perspectives. As Nick Robinson tweeted<

Much but not all of this is done through social media. Political debate ,as opposed to the political exchange of fire, is harder now to engage in. Voters are increasingly endorsing populist-right and left- politicians who offer simple solutions, ignore complexity and play successfully on emotions and fears.

Polarised politics though has certain key definable features we need to understand and as importantly worry about emulating.

It characterises political opposition in terms of a moral gulf. Those who back a different position are knaves, fools or both. They are not just people who have arrived at a different opinion. There can be no dalliance with the enemy not just because they are wrong but because they are necessarily evil. So we have the coarsening of political discourse, mindless abuse of opponents etc 

A second key characteristic is to deny or minimise the possibility of shared truths between political opponents. One side has to have got all the facts right and the other side all the facts wrong.Intelligence is only ever used by opponents to mislead and confound. 

These two key characteristics act to reinforce each other. It cannot possibly be the case that one’s political opponents have looked at the same facts one sees and arrived at different conclusions, possibly sharing some similar core values to oneself. That’s a liberal mirage.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 20 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 14th Dec - 4:43pm
    The challenge for the party is to connect with as many voters as possible. The fallacy that we can target a core vote is just...
  • User AvatarDan 14th Dec - 4:38pm
    I think as a party we misunderstood Brexit and Europe. We tried shouting at the keavers and drove them into the waiting arms of the...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 14th Dec - 4:34pm
    @Richard Armitage "As a Labour member I also thought the idea of a progressive alliance was a good one." Please tell us what you mean...
  • User AvatarMike MacSween 14th Dec - 4:16pm
    Lawrence Fullick 14th Dec '19 - 2:39pm "Mike MacSween There are times when a policy passed by Conferenve is a vote loser among parts of...
  • User AvatarPhil Beesley 14th Dec - 4:08pm
    @David Becket: "I would agree that attacking Corbyn was one of Jo’s many mistakes..." I reckon that kicking a player when they are down is...
  • User AvatarDan M-B 14th Dec - 4:06pm
    "My own view is that the soul of this party is on the left of UK politics and did well when New Labour left space...
Tue 7th Jan 2020