The Scottish Government has published its budget. But it’s for one year not three! No SNP Minister can explain why it was right for nationalists in Wales to produce figures for three years but not for the SNP Government in Scotland.
SNP Ministers say they can’t give a four-year budget because they have just set up a public service reform group. That’s code for “we don’t know what to do but whatever we do will be after next May’s Election. Yet the SNP have known the broad numbers for months.
After all, Alex Salmond wrote to Vince Cable on 12th February to say, “The public sector must now prepare for several years of fiscal austerity”. And in April and June the SNP Chief Economist published budget estimates up to the year 2028 within three decimal places, showing reductions.
This SNP Budget is for the election not for long-term certainty. It’s for short term nationalist interests, not the long term needs of Scotland.
We’ve said this Budget is too severe on services but too soft on waste.
We say that it is “too severe” because it is too short-term. For example because local government or colleges don’t know the long term figures, they may cut too sharply in the first year.
It looks like the SNP’s top priority is to make sure nothing bad has got their name on it.
They haven’t made the important decisions on high pay, bonuses, quango waste. There is rhetoric on hospital consultants’ bonuses, but little action.
And what about building schools, hospitals and railways? The SNP are finally willing to use PPP, but only after three years of delay – not one non-profit-distributing school or hospital project is on the Government’s books at the moment.
Our Finance spokesperson, Jeremy Purvis, has published a list of planned savings.
They total £4bn over a four year period and are sufficient to cover the drop in the Scottish Block. The Liberal Democrats have done the work that the Scottish Government refuses to do.
Over four years, the Liberal Democrats will, amongst other measures:
- Cut quango expenditure, saving £45 million;
- Cut the pay bill by 10% for the top paid public sector workers, saving £260 million;
- Stop bonuses in the public sector, saving £167 million;
- Increase efficiency targets by a reasonable 0.75%, saving over £2 billion;
- Make Scottish Water borrow from the markets, not the taxpayer, saving £600 million;
- Reduce waste in drug expenditure, saving £475 million;
- Retain but reform concessionary travel, saving £120 million;
- Keep free school meals only at the extended entitlement, saving £120 million.
We will publish a list of the right spending, the right choices for Scotland. But we’re clear that the SNP Budget doesn’t take action on education for children from deprived backgrounds, low income pensioners, properly supported jobs and businesses and college and university funding.
We have clear and costed plans to save money and protect the services that people across the country rely on. The Labour party want to centralise services and create new quangos, which could cost millions and will jeopardise local decision making. The SNP have an election plan, but no plan to protect services or make the necessary savings. And the Tories in Scotland? Well they’ve always propped up the SNP Government’s Budget so this year will define their approach.
People in Scotland don’t want their politicians to be electioneering with the Budget. They want clear plans to create jobs and protect vital services. That’s what we will do.
2 Comments
Sorry Tavish this looks like waffle with the same old bogeymen
Taken one at a time
* Cut quango expenditure, saving £45 million; ? Which quangos, what work are they doing, who will do it instead?
* Cut the pay bill by 10% for the top paid public sector workers, saving £260 million; By imposing a 10% pay cut or a recruitment freeze?
* Stop bonuses in the public sector, saving £167 million; Does this include the bonuses of building labourers in housing associations? Whose bonuses? What if they take you to a tribunal for constructive dismissal?
* Increase efficiency targets by a reasonable 0.75%, saving over £2 billion; What is current target? Is it being met? Are savings going to be double counted in the 10% pay bill cut?
* Make Scottish Water borrow from the markets, not the taxpayer, saving £600 million; How does it save money to borrow at a higher rate of interest?
* Reduce waste in drug expenditure, saving £475 million; Presumably no one is in favour of waste in drug expenditure so what would you do differently?
* Retain but reform concessionary travel, saving £120 million; So who loses out?
* Keep free school meals only at the extended entitlement, saving £120 million. So who loses out?
If we have to behave responsibly and honestly and make difficult decisions at Westminster, it does us no good when you come out with opportunistic, populist soundbites.
Tavish has exactly the right idea which other Liberal Democrats in Wales and possibly even some in the English council elections will try.
He does not mention Nick or the coalition once and is trying to distance himself as far as humanly possible from both them and the cuts and crackdown on the poor and vulnerable. This also allows him to ignore the student tuition fees debacle and though it might not work too well with those who have actually noticed what’s been going on in Westminster, it at least has a far better chance of succeeding than defending the coalition and Nick’s leadership.
This disassociation strategy is a measure of how desperate things have become and though it will be more effective than defending Nick and the coalitions plans it hardly needs pointed out that it cannot go on indefinitely. We cannot continue with a Leader who is seen as a toxic by the public and we certainly can’t fight a general election with an electoral liability. Nick was not slow to take advantage of Menzies unpopularity with the public so he can have few complaints when the same thing is done to him.