More detail has emerged on the technical reality of the government’s plan to store data on every email and internet transaction in the UK. The Independent has the story:
Internet “black boxes” will be used to collect every email and web visit in the UK under the Government’s plans for a giant “big brother” database, The Independent has learnt.
Home Office officials have told senior figures from the internet and telecommunications industries that the “black box” technology could automatically retain and store raw data from the web before transferring it to a giant central database controlled by the Government.
…
“It was clear the ‘back box’ is the technology the Government will use to hold all the data. But what isn’t clear is what the Home Secretary, GCHQ and the security services intend to do with all this information in the future,” said a source close to the meeting.
He added: “They said they only wanted to return to a position they were in before the emergence of internet communication, when they were able to monitor all correspondence with a police suspect. The difference here is they will be in a much better position to spy on many more people on the basis of their internet behaviour. Also there’s a grey area between what is content and what is traffic. Is what is said in a chat room content or just traffic?”
Can anyone offer technical input to this ‘phobe? What might be meant by this “black box”?
The article also states that “consultation” on the Communications Data Bill will take place in the new year. As, coincidentally, will the possible launch of a website on which the public can register an interest in having an ID card. What shall we do with our last two months of freedom?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The Joy of Six 1589
The oldest pub in Swansea and the secret tunnel
Why I'm fighting these plans
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
Nigel Quinton
Chris Rennard
Tony Robertson
Alex Macfie
6 Comments
From a technical point of view, the bigger the database and the more people who have access to it, the less secure is the whole system.
It will leak data 24 hours a day like a monsoon.
That is even before it is attacked or otherwise subverted like any other prominent information silo, becoming a magnet for crazies or those just challenged by the stupidity of anyone who would build such a thing.
It will make us all less safe and more likely to be targeted by criminals, terrorists, paedophiles and assorted weirdos.
This is what the New Labour government is intent upon inflicting on you.
However, this is a European diktat and has its origins in the American Patriot Acts.
Whichever party replaces the New Labour numbskulls will be stuck with it.
This is the Brave New World.
Internet censorship; the gagging of free speech; the hobbling of civil liberties; the end of the information age.
As you say, enjoy your last few months of freedom, then lie down and fasten and padlock your own chains.
Or stand up and be counted.
http://communicationsdatabill.info/blogs/
A Black Box is likely a computer that will sit in an Internet Service Provider’s (ISP’s) machine room. An ISP might be one that provides connection for a domestic Internet connection. It might be a large company, because suspects may communicate with colleagues, and it might be a university, because UK universities have their own network.
Such boxes could inspect Internet traffic as it passes through the local network (not necessarily through the machine itself), inspecting the traffic at various levels. One presumes that it will log sender/recipient information for emails and requestor/site information for web traffic.
Of course, if you’re a smart criminal, you’ll quickly work out ways of circumventing this. For example, you could easily create a botnet of several million machines all creating diversionary traffic. Like spammers already have done, but with the specific purpose of masking your communications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet
I’m not clear what data the government are planning to monitor and store. However the directive referred to above is quite clear that:
“It shall not apply to the content of electronic communications, including
information consulted using an electronic communications network.” (ARt 1 para 2)
“No data revealing the content of the communication may be retained pursuant to this Directive.” (Art 5 para 2, Directive 2006/24/EC)
The Government may well be going beyond the scope of the Directive (which is in itself a piece of legislation that is stretching EU competencies and has been inadequately challenged). We wouldn’t however be “stuck with that”.
This is a very worrying departure. We were assured that it was not going to happen ! My gut response is that such proposals need to be resisted all the way. Civil Liberties will be a thing of the past if these proposals are agreed. Who joins the battle ?
Who is “We”, and what were the assurances?
Are you saying the the Governemnt said it would not go beyond the scope of the directive.
To get the correct quotation I’ll have to get back to Hywel after parliament sits again. But I was there !!! Happy New Year.