The Treasury Select Committee has launched an inquiry into Business Rates, to examine their impact on business, including Business Rates retention and alternatives to property-based taxes, such as the proposed digital services tax. Crucially the inquiry will consider the impact of changes (proposed and actual) of Business Rates on Local Authorities and Councils, and the High Street.
Sebastian McCarthy in City Am quotes Nicky Morgan MP, chair of the treasury committee: “Many high street businesses are struggling to remain competitive. It has been estimated that 10,000 shops will close this year. Unless action is taken, closures could continue and job losses may soar”, adding: “We’ll examine how the current system is working and consider whether an alternative system, for example, a land-value based tax, may help level the playing field between retailers.”
The non-domestic rates multiplier will rise to 50.6p in the pound in April, marking the first time that firms will pay an effective tax rate of more than 50 percent on their properties.
John Webber, head of business rates at Colliers International said “…the current business rates regime needs a roots and branches reform: regular revaluations, a proper review of reliefs, a sensible multiplier, a reform of the appeals system (which ground to a halt in 2017) and a properly funded valuation office, as well as some immediate action- to freeze rates rises this year and to remove downwards transition, that is strangling many of the provincial retail stores. But…if the Government insists on raising the same amount of money by the same group of people (25-30 percent of business rates are paid by the retail sector), then we will be no further forward.”
The Liberal Democrat policy on business rates calls for replacing business rates with a commercial landowner levy i.e. assessments based on land rental values excluding buildings and other improvements. The Policy was adopted at the 2018 autumn conference Tax Land Not Investment.
Vince cable speaking to the policy said:
“Business rates were a badly designed policy to begin with and have become an unacceptable drag on our economy. They are a tax on productive investment at a time of chronically weak productivity growth, and a burden on high streets struggling to adapt to the rise of online retail.”
“Many of the areas around the country that voted for Brexit feel they have been left behind. In place of policies, the Brexiters offer only rhetoric. Great swathes of the country demand better, and this policy offers change to the manufacturing industry and the small towns passed over by economic growth.”
The IFS has come to the same conclusion IFS backs Land Value Tax saying a Land Value Tax “would remove altogether the disincentive to develop and use property that business rates create.”
ALTER will make a submission to the Select Committee Inquiry
based on Libdem policy and the capture of economic rents accruing to the benefit of International digital services companies operating in the UK.
* Joe is a Vice-Chair of Hounslow Liberal Democrats and Chair of ALTER.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The death of the York to Hull line
You Tube Channel
People's Vote Rally
The inflation condundrum: orthodox economics under challenge
The letters of the alphabet
Reporting Back Strategic Commissioning Board
Patrick
David Raw
expats
Peter Martin
Katharine Pindar
6 Comments
One recurrent criticism of LVT is the alledged attendent need for frequent and accurate land valuations. I wonder if this would be a fruitful application of artifical intelligence. I envisage an AI app which, when fed the boundary coordinates of a parcel of land, could produce a presumptive (challengeable) valuation based on data from various sources. Perhaps such a thing already exists?
I thought the article might be more about a LVT than business rates!
The idea of a LVT goes back to the 19th century and the 1897 book written by Henry George, Progress and Poverty. His idea was it could be a single tax. It would have appealed to the emerging capitalist class, at the time, who didn’t like the idea of paying out ‘money for nothing’ to the more established aristocracy who owned much of the land.
Effectively, although modern day Lib Dems might not want to see it like that, Georgists wanted land nationalised without compensation so only the Government would then receive rental value from land. The capitalists would pay their land rent to the Government instead of the aristocracy and so the Government would have no need to levy income taxes, business rates, purchase taxes, import duties etc. That was the theory!
Hopefully we’ve moved on in the 21st century from 19th century conflicts between capitalists and the aristocracy. LVT could have a place in a balanced and well managed tax structure, but it will be just another tax. Don’t hold your breath waiting for it to replace income tax or even business rates!
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=30215
@Paul Griffiths AI might well produce a more accurate prediction of sale value than a human. If it doesn’t exist, there are no doubt estate agents who would love to get their hands on it. In taxation though, I think transparency and predictability take precedence and you need a complex but conventional deterministic algorithm that anyone can use and get the same result.
Paul Griffiths/Peter Davies,
AI may have an application in the future on Land surveyors Geomapping software currently employed for Land Valuations. The research paper linked above
https://www.libdems.org.uk/autumn-18-replacing-business-rates discusses Land Valuation in Section 5.
The Key messages note “Business rates are based on valuations that are usually considerably outdated. Even with triennial revaluations in future, values will always be between 2 and 5 years out of date. And the tax is designed to rise when rents fall, such as in a recession, to keep revenue unchanged in real terms.
With annual revaluations and greater flexibility, the Commercial Landowner Levy would better reflect local economic conditions, and avoid large infrequent changes.
This would support businesses in difficult economic times, and raise additional tax revenues in good times.
Business rates are assessed and administered on the basis of over 2 million premises in England and Wales, but often these are in the same building or on the same bit of land.
The Commercial Landowner Levy would be far easier for local authorities to collect, with fewer plots of land than rateable business premises. The number of bills would be reduced to 800,000, saving councils and businesses time and money.”
Peter Martin,
LVT does indeed have a place in a balanced and well-managed tax structure, as Vince Cable outlined when the policy was adopted by Liberal Democrats last year.
With the Conservative Chair of the Treasury Select Committee, Nicky Morgan, announcing in her press release that: “We’ll examine how the current system is working and consider whether an alternative system, for example a land-value based tax, may help level the playing field between retailers.” – it is not so much a case of don’t hold your breath, but rather a case of watch this space.
https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/treasury-committee/news-parliament-2017/inquiry-launch-into-the-impact-of-business-rates-on-business-17-19/
With all the uncertainty that the possibility of Brexit is causing businesses, they need all the help they can get and abolishing business rates must be a step in the right direction.