The liberal order is not defended by manners; it is defended by resolve 

On 4 April 1949, 12 nations signed a treaty to establish collective security, combat totalitarianism, and strengthen transatlantic ties: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. That treaty came to be known as the North Atlantic Treaty, now more commonly known as NATO. 

Now, 77 years later, that same alliance is under threat. The United States of America, under the rule of Donald Trump, is threatening to take control of Greenland, while US officials have refused to rule out military action. 

This is truly the darkest timeline. NATO was established to maintain security across the Atlantic and strengthen the ties that bind us. However, Trump has made clear that those ties are not just weak but completely obliterated, existing only when the price is right for Trump and his cronies. 

Trump’s refusal to respect sovereignty and international law must be a wake-up call for those who have comforted themselves with the idea that he “would never do anything to us”. He already targets our institutions, strong-arming the NHS into a deal that would raise the price the NHS pays for new medicines by 25%, and carrying out funding cuts, leading some UK universities to cancel research projects due to his “assault on science

This is Trump toting his soft power. He is showing us “this is what I can do without raising a finger”. His approach to Ukraine, his attack on Venezuela, his military threats against Denmark are overt displays of his hard power; pulling military support, carrying out invasions and claiming dominion over an entire nation, and then willing threaten further military action against an ally, it all adds up to the same conclusion: Donald Trump does not care about international law, and Donald Trump will not stop until his vision is achieved. 

Where should the UK stand on this situation? While the Prime Minister has made some positive remarks about “the future of Greenland, Denmark’s leader has gone a step further in confirming that, if the US attacks Denmark, Denmark will defend itself. While warm words are nice, this is far from an Article 5 statement. We must make it clear: NATO will not flinch in protecting its members, even against one another. 

It is not only the liberal position but also the correct position to support Denmark in the event of an American invasion. We are allies, both NATO and European. We share not only a continent, but also values and principles. The phrase “fascism” is often overused in online circles, but Trump’s actions and rhetoric warrant it; he is leading a fascist regime and is threatening to launch a fascist invasion of Denmark. We are already seeing a fascist invasion from the East, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 

The UK cannot remain silent, nor can we ignore the bleak reality unfolding on our continent. If we do not take the lead in defending Europe’s future now, we will be forced to do so by a world war.

Liberalism is not a mood; it is a commitment. International law, sovereignty, and human rights survive only when the democracies that uphold them are willing to defend them. If we do not draw a line here, we will be left negotiating from the floor later.

* Jack Meredith is a member of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and an active campaigner and canvasser with Swansea and Gower Liberal Democrats. His writing focuses on democratic reform, social justice, trade unionism, economic democracy, and the institutional foundations of effective government. He has written for the Fabians, Lib Dem Voice, Liberator, Nation Cymru, Bylines Cymru, and Centre Think Tank.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • You can’t seriously suggest that NATO countries will take up arms in the defence of Greenland against another NATO country – the US…Utter fantasy.

  • Steve Coltman 7th Jan '26 - 9:48am

    The future looks ominous, as worrying as any time since the 1930s perhaps. NATO is at risk but Europe in general and the UK in particular are not ready for a post-NATO world. We depend to a dangerous degree on the US, not just for our nuclear deterrent but also for their support in the event of a conventional war with Russia. The conventional war that our European allies are right now preparing for and we are pretending can’t ever happen. If we engaged with Russia in the kind of missile exchange that occurred between Israel and Iran we would lose very quickly. Not only do we not have an air defence system as good as Israel’s, we don’t even have one as useless as Iran’s. And we don’t have much to fire back at Russia either. It is easy for the opposition to criticise but the Government really is between a rock and a hard place. Military weakness has left us with no good options.

  • Jack; Starmer being an ardent supporter of the EU could make a public statement outside Downing Street – if he had the political gravitas to carry it out – that Britain must be fully integrated into the EU to combat the obvious and glaring change in the Western Alliance given the US administrations statements on Greenland…It’s not something I’d agree with – but he may not get a better chance to carry such a significant change in policy direction…?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Daniel Walker
    @Peter Martin It's not really about the EU. It's about Tom making a statement (implying that the process for electing the President of the European Commissi...
  • Peter Martin
    Does anyone else think it's odd that a party which is keen on devolving power to the local level is also keen to join a supra national political entity which wa...
  • Peter Martin
    As often happens on LDV any discussion quickly, in this case from the first comment, gets on to the EU even though the OP isn't about the EU. I still think ...
  • Chris Cory
    I agree entirely with the sentiment behind this article, although it’s a bit depressing that it’s going to take the prospect of war to make government start...
  • Ruth Bright
    Such a heartening Question Time from Jake 👏...