The Ministry of Justice runs into a little furniture bother

By Mark Pack | Tue 19th October 2010 - 3:25 pm

Imagine the conversation later this year, somewhere in Whitehall:

Civil servant Good news Minister. Our new arrangements for buying furniture are coming up to the end of their first year and everything is looking really good.

Minister Excellent news. Do you mind letting me have some figures on how the arrangements have performed compared to the previous contracts?

Civil servant I’m terribly sorry Minister, but we haven’t kept all the records of the previous contract.

Minister What about the records just from 2009 then?

Civil servant Sorry, but we haven’t got all of them.

Minister You mean you don’t have the records any more even for something as recent as last year?

Civil servant No, Minister.

Minister So you are telling me we can’t actually properly check whether our new arrangements are doing better or worse than the old ones?

Civil servant I’m afraid so Minister.

It would be pretty underwhelming, wouldn’t it?

Well, that’s just what the Ministry of Justice have managed. Despite the MoJ’s love of paperwork (Work for the MoJ and driving your own car on work business? That’d be four different forms you are meant to keep in the vehicle at all times), it already no longer has full records for its furniture contracts which ended in late 2009 as this Parliamentary Question from Conservative MP Matthew Hancock revealed.

So let’s just hope the MoJ really has improved its furniture supply arrangements, because the records aren’t there any more to tell us for sure.

3 Comments

mike hartley 19th Oct '10 - 3:54pm

No where to write this where it is directly relevant, but just wanted to post to say that I (and I’m sure many Lib Dems) think it’s appalling that the Lib Dem leadership is sitting by quietly while the Tories use the Spending Review to do what they’ve always wanted and emasculate the BBC.

Shame on Clegg, Alexander and the rest of them.
Niklas Smith 19th Oct '10 - 5:17pm

Another slightly off topic comment – but it least it concerns chairs 🙂

This post reminded me of one of Bernard Wooley’s one-liners from Yes Minister:

“It used to be said there were two kinds of chairs to go with two kinds of Ministers: one sort that folds up instantly, the other sort goes round and round in circles.”

I wonder which sort they got for Ken Clarke? (Although so far he has certainly done neither, indeed he has been a joy to behold in comparison to Jack Straw.)
MrsB 20th Oct '10 - 8:26am

I can think of three reasons they would not have the contracts: they have deliberately “lost” them because they are potentially embarrassing to someone; they are totally incompetent at keeping records; or their procurement process is so shambolic that they didn’t have proper contracts and controls in the first place.
Labour please note: lack of records refers to the time YOU were running things.