The NHS Track and Trace app is here to stay. Even if Covid-19 were to disappear from the planet tomorrow, there is no turning back from this point; track and trace apps will become a permanent fixture of the health service. And now that we know what an app should be able to do, why would we rely on one for Covid-19? If it helps to save lives, then surely an app could help us to guard against annual winter flu pandemics; what about chickenpox and a whole host of other infectious diseases? Thinking ahead, it is not inconceivable to imagine that we will have all be required to have a permanent mobile app, which can be used to track our exposure to deadly diseases, but also hold our personal medical records.
Over 12 million people have downloaded the app already, a number that is likely to rise. This represents a significant upwards shift in the technological responsibilities of the state. Just as the state once needed to build a Navy and then an Airforce to save us from invasion, today we need a fully-functioning health app to save us from a deadly pandemic. Legitimate questions can be asked of how well it does so. Questioning the government’s ability to do so is not the purpose of this article – that’s a separate argument – the point is that questioning the rollout of an essential service is now a requirement for a party of opposition. We need to think intelligently about how best to do so.
The likely longevity of the app presents a fresh challenge for Liberals: how do we strike a balance between protecting civil liberties, yet holding the government to account for delivering a new technological service? Unless we want to sound like Luddites, we cannot oppose the rollout of the app on the basis that the state should not have access to our data. In the context of saving lives during a pandemic, no way would work: we need the app to protect us, and it needs our personal data to do so. Neither will this be the last technological leap in the capacity of the state.
Liberals should focus on safeguarding the UK’s existing data protection legislation, mainly to make sure that it is not watered down after the transition period ends. We should focus on ensuring that the regulator responsible for enforcing those rights has sufficient funding to do so. We should call for the government to advance and harden the upcoming legislation on Online Harms, rather than diluting it in an attempt to appease the tech industry.
Without wanting to sound glib, the general position we should fashion on technological progress is of how tech can benefit humanity. This would make clear that we will put the interests of citizens before business, but positively encourage innovation that improves the lives of the people we wish to serve (the app being a prime example). Building a narrative of how technology can be used to protect and empower citizens will enable the Liberal Democrats to define ourselves by asking for something, rather than reacting to the government. The Labour party doesn’t seem to be hurrying to adopt this position, so it’s territory we can own outright. The Track and Trace app won’t be the last technological leap in the provision of government services, let’s start calling for the next one.
* David is the former Parliamentary Candidate for North Dorset. He helped write our party's response to the government's National Data Strategy and has recently moved back to his hometown, Cheltenham.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
My tweets
Action on the Metropolitan Police, at last
Getting things done - Greater Balgay #dundeewestend
Brian Eley, the only British Chess Champion to appear on Crimewatch, is dead
New for Summer in my Etsy Shop: Birds, butterflies and bright colours.
TonyH
Nonconformistradical
George Thomas
Ruth Bright
Brad Barrows
21 Comments
I fear the current direction of things is to authoritarian ideas not liberal ones. Wear a mask and stuff firvsure but I’m not using that app
One question – is interpretation of the 12 million figure correct? My impression is that the government is saying the Covid app has been downloaded 12 million times – which is not the same as it being on 12 million phones. Some users will have downloaded it to phones on which it won’t work; others will have downloaded it a few times to try to make it work.
One comment – for government to use technology to provide services will require a step change in government’s tech competence.
questions! An app for this, an app for that .Will adverts be shown or guide you to a product that will ‘cure’ you?
Who will be holding the’ private medical details of the person?he individual or a govnt database or maybe the NHS
Remember apps are a consumer thing and open for some one to sell something. Is it a way to sideline the NHS for the Tories do want to get rid of it.
You need a relatively modern mobile phone to make it work, apparently. Thank goodness that mine won’t take it, although I noticed today when my wife and I had a coffee at Starbucks they asked for our phone number.
People boasting about not using it are as irresponsible as those who refuse to wear a mask
The current direction of government is certainly authoritarian and they tried to build the app that some commenters fear. I would not have downloaded that one. The current app is not that one. Your tracking data is not available to government or Starbucks or any of the people who get to see your data for manual track-and-trace. The technology may not be perfect. I’m sure GCHQ could hack it if I was that interesting but there is far less chance of your data being exposed to someone really worrying (like a scammer or an ex) than with a manual system half as effective.
Guy, that’s spot on. If we accept that this is now a required public service then we can start to think and talk about the best way of delivering digital public services. That earns us more credibility than opposing it. I would imagine that there is a close correlation between downloads and users but that figure hasn’t been revealed.
Agreed Peter, we should be much more concerned with private sector practices (i.e. Cambridge Analytica) than the NHS app that has been launched in our best interests.
Is the government going to supply me with an up to date I phone or smart phone so my wife and I can download this life saving app. Can’t wait to walk around with this phone in my hand 24 hours a day.
I’ve read the article and I’m still not clear what ‘liberals should say’ unless it is that we don’t really know what to say.
I say download it already.
“The likely longevity of the app presents a fresh challenge”? No it doesn’t. Uninstall it when the pandemic is over.
“we need the app to protect us, and it needs our personal data to do so” Yes we do, but no it doesn’t. The app doesn’t have or use our personal data.
“Liberals should focus on safeguarding the UK’s existing data protection legislation” Maybe, I don’t massively care, to be honest. I often wonder if data protection has gone too far. Certainly it isn’t the thing to focus on right now. Download the app already, wash your hands, cover your face, keep your distance.
Every day each of us will be watched by, on average, 70 CCTV cameras. When I was a councillor I was struck by how often residents demanded that cameras should be installed because they made them feel safer. Surveillance is a fact of life already.
I am pleased that we now have an app which protects us. Its design means that my personal data is not captured, although, tbh I’m not entirely sure how much is stored.
The app does process personal data. Data protection legislation defines personal data is “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural human being”.
This app, or other track-and-trace apps, are likely to become a permanent government service. As a party, this presents an opportunity to think creatively about how to respond, there is political space for us to carve out a niche for ourselves as the party that wants to deliver better public services by adopting best practices from digital innovation. For instance, this might mean creating a new government department responsible for delivering logistics and affairs, similar to the one that was created by FDR.
David, specifically what personal data are you claiming this app holds?
And why do you think it is likely to become permanent? Obviously we will want it back when the next pandemic comes along, but why wouldn’t we all uninstall it in between pandemics and save a little bit of battery.
David:
A group of data scientists is advising our parliamentary party on aspects of the government’s ‘digital strategy’, on which as you will know we are promised a White Paper soon. The question of digital identity is one of our main concerns – on which the private sector is far ahead of the public, and the structure of regulation is incomplete. If you have time to help, do contact me at the House of Lords.
@Barry Lofty “Is the government going to supply me with an up to date I phone or smart phone so my wife and I can download this life saving app. Can’t wait to walk around with this phone in my hand 24 hours a day.”
While it won’t work for everyone (lack of a recent-ish phone being the main reason) it will work for the majority of the population who do, in theory leaving more staff available to do track and trace on the rest.
And you don’t need to have it “in your hand” 24hrs a day; in your pocket is fine.
As someone who enjoys the benefits of modern connectivity I do worry about data security, mission creep and the thin end of the wedge. Disconnection when safe and responsible to do so seems the only way forward at present.
Thank you William i have sent you an email.
Joe – the app’s privacy notice provides a description on the type of personal data it collects (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-covid-19-app-privacy-information/nhs-test-and-trace-app-early-adopter-trial-august-2020-privacy-notice#what-data-the-app-uses)
Daniel – in addition to that we’ve also seen some governments issuing physical bluetooth enabled tokens/keyrings for people without phones. Singapore, for example.
Mary, CCTV is an intriguing point. The human footage that CCTV captures can be considered personal data. Facial Recognition is a hotly-contested service that many corporations are moving away from providing, which i welcome because the technology rarely works properly, is intrusive and inhumane. It will be interesting to see if concerns about facial recognition bubble up to become objections about CCTV, as in reality they perform similar tasks.
Daniel Walker: Thanks for the info which is,seriously, reassuring and glad I will be able to keep both hands free!
” what should liberals say”
I haven’t downloaded the app
My phone runs out of battery if bluetooth is on
My phone is at home/off/out of battery
Who are you to be asking?
App or no app I seriously mistrust this governments advice on anything and in particular their attitude towards the more vulnerable in our society and as my wife and I fall into that category it is really depressing, thank goodness for our three children and nine grandchildren, but we do miss their hugs and kisses although realising there are so many worse off!
David, this is all a bit of a stretch. The app stores a postcode. Nothing connects that postcode to me except that I know it is my postcode and I know it is my phone.
And you know, the government already knows my postcode.
I suggest all this talk of personal data is deceptive.