Readers of today’s Observer story by Toby Helm regarding Lib Dem ministers contributing 10% of their salaries to the party may have thought it had a familiar ring to it. That’d be because it was first reported back in December, as we blogged back then. Ah well, nothing like old news 🙂
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Jane Dodds to step down as Welsh Lib Dem Leader (Caron Lindsay)
-
The silent scandal of ME…and in praise of Tessa Munt (Paul Walter)
-
The Lib Dems should be bolder. Here’s how…. (James Hill)
-
Before we talk about coalition, we must ask: What are the Liberal Democrats for? (Maria Linforth-Hall)
-
Support to enable Disabled People to live Independently (Richard Whelan)
More ministerial dissent over Labour's immigration policies
Jane Dodds stands down as Welsh Lib Dem leader
The straight and narrow path to Marzipan Tunnel
Recent Comments
Alex Macfie
Take on Big Tech — properly. Not with user bans and age verification. Not only are these shockingly paternalistic and illiberal, but they wil...
Rob Heale
The boldest option would be to adhere to our aims set out in the Party Constitution to be free from poverty. People living in poverty can rarely be free because...
Chris Moore
Battling on against the current with scarce means or attention from the media. Excellent radical liberal focussing on the issues that really matter. An...
Adam
4,700 Jewish soldiers fought for the Prussian army in the Franco Prussian war. They fought with distinction - many of them received the Iron Cross. When Germany...
Paul
Thank you Jane for your tireless work over the last decade. You stood for leader when it would have been easier not to, you’ve fought elections when it would ...
3 Comments
The party’s budget shows a full year income from ministerial tithes of £40k for 2011, yet the forecast for 2010 is only £6,500 income. Surely as this is roughly a half year that forecast should by £20,000?
There are some very wealthy MPs in the cabinet and I am sure some of them could pay double the amount they are being asked for and not notice the difference.
Party funding should have been included in the Coalition agreement.
Given where we are today then those responsible for the party finances should be careful not to be bought off by the financial services industry who want to stop us from regulating them.
Well, if the Observer can ‘get away with old news’, perhaps it’s an indication that not enough effective publicity was given to the story by our Cowley Street Press Office when it first made the announcement .
So we should be grateful that one newspaper has decided to pick it up and run with it : we need all the favourable exposure we can get . Perhaps if we were nice to the press , we might get better results. What’s that old saw about honey and vinegar?