The PPC Files (3): What do your family and friends think about your decision to run for Parliament?

Imagine what it’s like to be a Liberal Democrat prospective parliamentary candidate – tasked with leading and motivating a group of diverse volunteers against all the odds, and organising foot-slogging campaigns on a shoe-string budget that will get you and the party noticed.

Lib Dem Voice contacted a dozen PPCs to find out what they really think about the experience. We guaranteed anonymity to ensure those responding felt able to say what they think, and not simply stick to the obligatory it’s-such-a-privilege line. Of the 12, seven are men and five women, and they include one ethnic minority candidate. The constituencies they hope to represent range from the south to the north, and include Lib Dem marginals and ‘no hope’ seats.

In today’s third instalment of The PPC Files, our ‘golden dozen’ tell us what their family and friends think of their decision to run for Parliament:

Delighted when my children were able to Google my name and proud to tell their friends their mum has been in the paper or TV.
Well done! is the comment from all professional colleagues.

Well… when I first told my Dad, there was this long silence on the other end of the phone, after which he said “I’ve never really thought much of politicians.” Has come down and campaigned for me in each general election, however. The rest of my family have thought it really interesting. My friends think it’s odd and don’t really understand the commitments and efforts involved.

Most of my friends understand the pressures and what I am trying to do, but sometimes it feels like my family think it’s some quaint little hobby that has got totally out of control.

They think it’s crazy – they don’t understand it.

They are very supportive, although it is a strain on family life. I work full-time and am also out 3-5 nights a week and spend some of every Saturday and Sunday doing Lib Dem/campaign related activity. My employer is very supportive (I work flexible hours and work five days in four so that I have one day on the campaign) but it is a tough schedule. The consequence of this is that I work, campaign and spend time with my family….that’s it. I have no social life outside of this, I’ve stopped playing football, going to the cinema, going for drinks after work, visiting friends around the country. I’m NOT complaining because it is my choice, but if you want to win then this is the way it has to be.

Very supportive. I would not have gone for it if they felt otherwise.

I have been politically active for a long time – around 20 years (and I’m only 35 so still perceived as being young by some!) – but I think it is fair that most of my family still think I should get a proper job, even though I have one. My friends are pretty supportive, even when they are politically disinterested.

I can only do this because of the 100% support of my family and friends. They all think I’m mad, but continue to support me….

My family and friends are impressed by my commitment, but frequently can’t see the sense in making it.

Most found it eccentric to some degree or other at first, although support from my immediate family has been unstinting. It’s interesting that over the years, it’s come to be accepted as part of what I am: although it’s also interesting that even quite close friends/family members (e.g. my mother!) occasionally assume that, as a politician, I’m fair game for a bit of a scolding when politicians in general are perceived to be letting the side down.

Some are very supportive; others in my extended family do not share the same politics and tend to be more right wing – they do not believe woman should be in politics or even in the work place.

In part 4 of The PPC Files (tomorrow): What’s different about being a Lib Dem PPC compared to being a Labour/Tory PPC?

The PPC Files (1): What are the three worst things about being a Lib Dem PPC?
The PPC Files (2): What do you wish you’d known before you became a Lib Dem parliamentary candidate?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Stephen is part 4 the same as part 3 or does the last paragraph need editing?

  • My (at the time) three year-old daughter on my time as PPC.

    Playing with her dinosaurs she gave the following commentary:’This is Daddy dinosaur,this is Baby dinosaur and Mummy dinosaur is at a meeting’

  • So? Lots of non-PPC women have experienced the same situation probably…

  • Ruth Bright 30th Jul '08 - 1:29pm

    Fair point – but at least most of them receive some financial compensation for the family time they give up. As some of the anonymous PPCs pointed out most people think we receive a salary or expenses anyway!

  • This set of articles is really becoming a bit of a pity party from the PPC’s end.

    I suspect this just might be because of the nature of the questions asked. I know PPC’s do a lot of work, but they do get the chance at being elected unlike average activists, and its not like there aren’t other people, in most cases, who wanted to do it and lost the vote.

  • It would be fine if I was listening to an activist who was moaning about delivering a few leaflets – they would have the right to moan…but someone who has applied for and obtained a voluntary position in the party and has associated tasks and duties that were obviously understood at the time of applying (if not perhaps the role needs to be explained better) cannot moan! If they really do find it that hard they should use their time doing something that they truly feel is worth their free time…

  • Antony Hook 30th Jul '08 - 4:35pm

    Well said, Jo.

    We don’t mind giving up our lives. At the end of the day it is an honour and it can be fun. That not “a line”- I really have enjoyed being a PPC and PEPC.

    But we are at least entitled to some respect that is not always forthcoming.

  • I’m not criticising the PPC’s, giving up a lot of time for a cause can obviously be a burden as much as a privlidge.

    I certainly know its a lot of hard work. I expect that activist pressure rather correleates with winable seats, so I think that is a valid point. In non-winnable seats they don’t have a chance to be elected, but then activists (at least the core ones) are likely to expect to be shipping off to a target seat anyway, so less pressure.

    PPC’s are people who make a greater commitment to the party, and gain a lot more workload but also opportunities. Hopefully they all understand this going in.

    I don’t see how we can make it easier for people who want less workload. Thats what we need to win in target seats. Just as PPC’s go to armchair members and try to get them to do as much as they can, so the party must for PPC’s. It may not always be nice but thats the way it goes.

    On the other hand, its fine for them to moan- I probably would! A lot of the time its going to be hard graft with any reward a long way away. My point was that the responses were fairly predicatable in this regard and not that insightful, largely due to the questions.

    I know activists who work harder than some PPC’s, and PPC’s who do an enormous job of work. Anybody who volunteers a large amount of their time has my respect for that regardless of their position- though its no coincidence that many of those at the top of that list are PPC’s!

  • I don’t think it should be much of a surprise that there is widespread contempt for our political classes after civic society has been continually undermined for decades through successive Conservative and Labour governments as the political interests which make up those parties have sought to attack the well-springs of liberty and democracy in our country in their campaign to gain office – it only seems natural that the general climate of scepticism promulgated by them and reflected across much of the media also has roots within our party.

    But the conclusions of that scepticism is what lead me to joining the LibDems and stand up for justice and fairness for all to help carry the fight against corruption and bad practices.

    The struggles our party faces at a local level and excessively burdens our prospective candidates at all levels is just a consequence of the weaknesses and fractious nature of the state we live in.

    If we have a complaint it is up to us to ask what can we do to improve the situation.

  • Chris Keating 30th Jul '08 - 6:27pm

    I think early selection is part of the issue. It’s vital to win a seat. But it does seem that many candidates in un-winnable seats were sold it on the likelihood of an early election and are now getting more than they bargained for.

    I can also relate to the idea in local parties that PPCs will work miracles. Of course some candidates big up their miraculous powers at the selection stage and then handily deflect their lack of success onto insufficient support from Cowley Street.

    Some go a step further and recruit an organiser who is also expected to have magical power 😉

    And I can tell you some nightmare stories about organisers’ experiences as well.

  • Well, local parties that expect a transformation from any one person need a metaphorical slap, and I guess that persons doomed efforts to live up to that will be it. I don’t doubt all the stories of unrealistic, pressuring activists, I just can’t relate to it from my own experience so I can’t really bring it into what I say.

    I don’t know if I would say tougher approval process, but I think there does seem to be a feeling some people don’t quite know what they are getting into- so it at least could be improved from the candidates perspective.

    Being a PPC may not involve the same parliamentary skills, but its going to be a long time if ever for a seat to be safe enough to not be doing the same type of campaigning once its taken, so PPC campaigning skills are vital.

    I’m not opposed to providing more professional support, but I think without more specific ideas its difficult to comment on that. I think that ALDC could possibly help the PCA achieve some of this, however.

    As to workload, it going down has a vote cost. Really solving the issue would require solving a lot more problems than I think we can- such as declining membership and interest in party activism, difficulties with media coverage, ect.

    Now, maybe lowering the workload will have other advantages, such as better PPC’s. I don’t think we can do it without risking votes though, and while I am not in a position to make a real assessment of whats worthwhile overall I think I can guess what the party apparatus, as empathic as most bureaucracies, will do.

  • This is a very worthwhile discussion, isn’t it? I think the key is the management of expectations on both sides.

    A priority seat would presumably have an excellent organisation and therefore a right to expect an incredible commitment from a PPC.

    In contrast, a seat with a decidedly patchy organisation should not expect an exceptional effort from the PPC.

    At the same time, PPCs should recognise how much they can realistically put in and go for the sort of seat where they fit best.

    The alternative is to have some PPCs almost killing themselves where there is no prospect of success: and others who expect to be carried to victory.

    It seems to me that there are three things that could be done:

    1. The candidate approval process could grade candidates in terms of their ability to commit time to working in a constituency.

    2. There could be a (regional?) appraisal process, so that local parties know how much they are entitled to expect from a PPC.

    3. Taking up Jo’s point, the shadowing of an MP should emphasise that the task of a PPC is much more demanding.

  • Yes, Jo C-S. I think it would mean precisely that: anybody with a job or children, or both would be pushed lower down the list. And so they should be.

    All our seats are a considerable challenge, both to win and to hold. It is nice, of course, to be inclusive, and give people a chance etc etc.

    In real terms, however, in order to win seats, we need people who are in a position to give as much as it takes.

    The alternative is to be nice and inclusive etc, and watch another merciless Tory Government take over the county.

  • Ruth Bright 5th Aug '08 - 5:19pm

    ‘Anybody with a job or children, or both would be pushed lower down the list. And so they should be.’

    Blimey, an approved list consisting only of those who are both independently wealthy and childless – should make a pretty short list!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • John Waller
    On 3 March 2022 AOL said Zelensky called for direct negotiations with Putin. On 11 March 2022 Pope Francis offered to Putin to mediate. Putin said “not no...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, As you know full employment is not defined as 0% unemployment for the reasons you gave. In the past it was defined as 2.5% unemployment. You...
  • Nigel Quinton
    To Tom Harney, while I suspect we do have slightly more influence than you suggest still, I agree it is minimal. What we can do, and should do immediately, is h...
  • Simon R
    @Katharine: Hard to explain stuff in 250 words but: Yes, ensuring everyone has a reasonable standard of living requires two things: Primarily you to make sure t...
  • Simon R
    @Peter Davies: Totally agree about the definition of poverty. When I talk about poverty, I generally mean the intuitive sense of people struggling to buy necess...