The real conflict in the land between the Sea and the River

The real conflict in the land between the Sea and the River is not between Palestinians & Israelis, it is not a religious war (there are Jews, Muslims, Christians & believers of other religions supporting both sides).  It is a conflict between, on one side, those who want that land exclusively for their side, realising that it will mean an ongoing war for the foreseeable future, a war that neither Palestine nor Israel can win but both Palestinians & Israelis will lose, and, on the other side, those who are willing to trade exclusivity for peace, who are willing to accept that both Palestinians & Israelis have the same right to claim the land as their people’s homeland and to be a free people in it.

The exclusivists on both sides are very good at painting the 100+ years of conflict in black and white, us or them, win or lose terms.  Indeed, the exclusivists on both sides are not above working with each other to stop those who accept the need to compromise being accepted as the real patriots.  Even the recent assassination of Ismail Haniyeh can be seen like this, the removal of a relatively moderate Hamas leader in such a way as to strengthen the hawks on both sides.

The reality is the opposite, it is those who believe Palestinians & Israelis  both have rights to that small sliver of land, who believe both people have ancient ties to it and that they both need to learn to live alongside each other who are the real patriots, the people who really love both the land the people who live there & want to see an end to the continual violence.

On both sides, the majority of people just want to be able to earn a living, to feed their families, to see their children grow up and fulfil their potential, to live in peace & dignity whether they live in Gaza or Ramallah, Tel Aviv or Bet Shemesh.   

Sadly, both sides are afflicted by political leaders who put their own wellbeing, political & personal, above the wellbeing of the people they claim to lead, leaders who are not afraid to shed other people’s blood to stay in power.

For the sake of Palestinian & Israeli children to come, so they don’t have to learn to kill or be killed, both nations need to find a way to change the narrative that binds them into the conflict.  This is why both Palestine & Israel need new leadership, leaders who realise that, while the past should not be forgotten, the future must not be bound by it.  

The only way to break out from the endless cycles of violence that afflicts Palestine & Israel is to change the narrative from exclusivity to inclusivity, to accept that terrible deeds have been committed by both sides, to accept that while the “truth” of each side is different neither version is wholly wrong or wholly right, but both are valid, to realise that neither the 7 million Palestinians nor the 7 million Jews who live between the Sea & the River are leaving the area willingly.  

Both Palestine & Israel need new leaders who are willing to compromise, however painful those compromises will be, new leaders willing to make difficult choices, to be leaders who lead their people on a new path & not just follow what has gone before.

Taking this different, inclusive way is not without risks, it is not without dangers.  We have seen leaders who take this path be killed by the extremists on their own side for threatening the old “certainties” that kept the conflict going. But unless we support those willing to face those dangers, take those risks, all we can be certain about is more innocents will be killed, more lives will be wasted and, in the biggest injustice of all, future generations will still grow up in the shadow of conflict.

So let us be brave, support those in both Palestine and Israel calling for compromise & inclusivity and denounce those who claim that only their side can be right.

 

* Leon Duveen is Chair of Liberal Democrats for Peace in the Middle East, a new group of Lib Dems working to support those trying to a solution to the Palestine/Israel conflict and to providing information about these peacemakers.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Denis Mollison 6th Aug '24 - 11:52pm

    I warmly support this, as the only reasonable longterm solution.
    But I fear it is very longterm, following the past year’s violence. What is the most effective way to start? Could the United Nations be revived sufficiently to provide a peace keeping force to supervise a way forward??

  • Christine Murdoch 7th Aug '24 - 8:50pm

    What a well balanced article, thank you.
    I have had the privilege of visiting Israel/Palestine on two occasions. I met with people in both communities. It is so complex. We need to work for compromise. However, that is the LD way.

  • Leon is promoting the single democratic state solution in preference to the two-state solution, which also has its supporters, including the Palestinian Ambassador to the UK, although he has told me he prefers to call it ‘the recognition of Palestine’. I know Leon is committed to peace in the Middle East, but I would respectfully point out that he may be wrong. I can’t really say any more than that.

  • Pamela Manning 8th Aug '24 - 1:41pm

    Leon I wonder if you have read the blogs of Avigail Abarbanel, a Jewish pschotherapist, who gave up her Israeil citizenship years after her IDF service. She explains how the whole culture in Israel instills fear and hate of the Arabs (Palestinians are rarely named). The majority of Israelis unquestioningly accept this view, as she herself did. A solution will only be found if this culture can be changed and it will take time. See Beyond Tribal Loyalties,the testimonies of Jewish peace actvists, edited by Abarbanel.

  • Leon, I admire your commitment to working for peace, but I don’t think this is a case where being even-handed and accepting that both sides have equal rights is going to work, however Utopian it might sound. I’m sure you would very happily live next door to someone with ancient Celtic lineage. But if they decided to live in your house, and share ownership with you, due to prior ancestral ownership of the land, would you be so happy? And suppose they achieved shared occupancy by evicting half your family at gunpoint? This analogy is imperfect of course, but land ownership by reference to ancient history is something not many of us would tolerate.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Joe Bourke
    Peter Martin, saving is done by that part of the population that can afford to do so. The bottom half of the population with little to no savings does not ch...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Joe, "When the government is running a deficit, it is exchanging currency for goods and services without taxing back that spending." Sure. Wh...
  • Mick Taylor
    Please Tom don’t repeat the mistake you have now made on at least 2 occasions when talking about the Far Right in Europe. The AFD did not take control of Thur...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, The link you provided gives unemployment at 3.8% and underemployment at 6.4% for 2023. Since then unemployment has increased to 4.2% 1.44 milli...
  • Jennie
    We'll miss you, Suzanne :(...