The top five London MPs for outside earnings

Via a survey carried out for comes this list of the top five London MPs for annual outside earnings on top of their MP salary of £65,738:

  1. Sir Malcolm Rifkind, MP for Kensington (Con) – upwards of £240,000
  2. Nick Raynsford, MP for Greenwich and Woolwich (Lab) – £60,657
  3. Mark Field, MP for Cities of London and Westminster (Con) – £41,740
  4. Jo Johnson, MP for Orpington (Con) – £12,314
  5. Diane Abbott, MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington (Lab) – £10,326

What do you think of these figures: good to see MPs having a range of activities or bad to see MPs spending time earning these sorts of sums?


Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and Parliament.


  • What on earth does Malcolm Riffkind do to pocket that kind of money given surely his ‘government links’ as an ex-Cabenet member must be getting quite rusty. Even Charles Clarke didn’t manage to make that much out of his multiple extra jobs after he lost his Cabinet post in the last parliament.

  • I think he has something to do with a defence contracting firm – I vaguely recall seeing him mentioned in that context on Newsnight back when defence contractors in Iraq was an issue. Not sure though so don’t quote me on it.

  • Sandra Folliot 30th Sep '11 - 11:29am

    this is rather meaningless if we don’t know HOW they earned that money.

  • david thorpe 30th Sep '11 - 1:54pm

    rifkind is a qc and with a directorship or two could pick up that kind of money easily

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Simon R
    @Michael: You appear to be questioning my liberalism. But, like it or not, the nature of the Universe is that people have to work because - bluntly, if everyone...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, I do accept that the economy needs people to do paid work to work. However, each individual makes choices and are not therefore forced to pay t...
  • Roger Lake
    This is -- or ought to be!-- amazing! And alarming. So far there are 12 reasoned responses to my title, most of them finding fault with my recommended propos...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might being sufficiently frightened of the main stream media, to the extent that a political party does not tell reasonable approximations of (socio-economic) t...
  • Geoff Reid
    The usual good sense from Peter Wrigley. The Conservatives and their media cheer leaders cannot get their heads round the possibility of higher taxes helping to...