What our busy peers will be up to this week

Here are some of the things our team in the House of Lords will be doing this week:

Monday: Roger Roberts will be pushing the Government to take action to relieve the situation of unaccompanied refugee children. Tim Farron has been pushing the Government to accept 3,000 at risk refugee children but David Cameron has recently rejected the proposal. The Liberal Democrats will continue to fight to find a solution which does not leave these children vulnerable.

John Lee is asking the Government what their latest assessment is of tourism’s contribution to the economy of the United Kingdom.

Dick Newby is leading a debate on the prospect of amending the Opticians Act 1989 to allow certain adjustable-focus eyewear to be sold over-the-counter in the same way reading glasses are currently.

The Trade Union Bill will be in its first day of Committee.

Tuesday: Malcolm Bruce will be asking the Government what action they intend to take to assist the viability of oil and gas exploration and development on the United Kingdom continental shelf in the light of the reduced price of oil.

Barbara Janke is pushing the Government on proposals for the renewal or replacement of failed housing estates, following the announcement by the Prime Minister of £140 million funding; and whether any additional funding will be made available. She will highlight the need for greater investment in social housing.

Liz Barker will ask the Government about future investment into the promotion of walking and cycling.

The Housing and Planning Bill will have potential amendments debated as it goes through Committee

Wednesday: The Trade Union Bill will be in Committee for a second day.

Thursday: Tony Greaves will be pushing the Government to reveal the impact of the Local Government Finance Settlement on the provision of libraries.

Mike Storey is asking whether the Government plans to legislate to ensure that food and drink provided in all types of schools follow Food Standards Agency food and nutritional guidelines.

Brian Paddick is asking Ministers about current guidance provided to police forces regarding the use of body-worn cameras by police officers.

The Armed Forces Bill will be read for a Second Time as Peers outline their concerns and potential amendments to the Bill.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Is the Tim Farron who “has been pushing the Government to accept 3,000 at risk refugee children but David Cameron has recently rejected the proposal,” the same Tim Farron who in December voted in favour of bombing in Syria when one of the Lib Dems five tests was “We call on the government to step up its acceptance of Syrian refugees, and opt in to Save the Children’s proposal to rehome 3000 unaccompanied refugee children,” and said “It is my judgement that, on balance, the five tests have been met as best as they can.”?

    Surely not, or are the LibDems still that easily taken in by David Cameron?

  • Thomas Shakespeare 8th Feb '16 - 8:48pm

    Hi “Ex Liberal”

    I don’t agree with the Syria vote. 2 / 8 MPs voted against, reflecting the difficulty of the vote. However, while I disagree, I think this article explains Tim’s position more clearly. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tim-farron-interview-lib-dem-leader-on-why-he-went-against-his-party-over-syrian-air-strikes-a6786891.html

  • Thomas, but the Independent article you link to says nothing about the 3,000 refugee children test. It only mentions the word refugee twice – once linking to an different article that has nothing about the test of the government taking 3,000 refugees; and another to the cheap, one line joke Cameron made about Lib Dem MPs. We have to accept that Tim totally misjudged this, claiming his tests had been met when this one clearly hadn’t and he lost another opportunity to actually get us noticed for doing (and achieving) something right. Likewise his argument that his decision won more votes than it lost isn’t being reflected in the opinion polls or even gains in by-elections. Is it?

  • I think we need to accept that Tim Farron is not any sort of unalloyed radical Liberal. He was an MP throughout the Coalition period, on his own admission, disappointed he wasn’t offered a ministerial position. In those circumstances it is not really surprising that he went along with the Cameron case. Interesting, and encouraging, that Norman Lamb did the opposite, having been a minister. Personally I was disappointed that John Pugh did not vote against. Perhaps the Lib Dems (and Labour, for that matter) is not a “pacifist party”, but there are many pacifists in our party, and I don’t think it comes well from our leader (with an enthusiastic Christian background, too) to rather rubbish the tradition, and attempts by pacifists to build a better more peaceful world. While we consider the effect on the children, perhaps we should reflect on the major traumas to which all, but particularly the children, are exposed to, and whether that makes war more or less likely in future generations. There are many reasons to oppose the bombing of Syria – the best case being made right now by the Russian action around Aleppo. What do we as Liberal Democrats (whether pacifists or not) think about that?

  • Thomas, Tim Farron’s ‘excuses’ for not following the party line smacks of Nick Clegg’s ‘apology’ over tuition fees…

    There have been several articles with Tim demanding action over a ‘condition’ that he said had been met “as best as they can.” If you set out ‘conditions/red lines’ then backtracking, when they are not met, shows both weakness and lack of conviction…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill. 19th Nov - 4:19pm
    Boris J. might have considered BBC4 'How to be an Ex-Prime Minister' on 22 July. Jeremy C. perhaps not. Michael Cockerell tells the story of...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 19th Nov - 3:53pm
    Is refugee a generic term including both asylum seekers and economic or other migrants?The terminology is very confusing. I know it is not always easy...
  • User AvatarDavid 19th Nov - 3:39pm
    I assume there is omerta on this site about the 'revelation' that the more the electors see of our Leader, the less they warm to...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Nov - 3:33pm
    Martin, You are wrong. I would not have criticised the leadership if, as *some* senior Lib Dems judged it, Labour MPs had voted through Brexit,...
  • User AvatarRoland 19th Nov - 3:30pm
    @Innocent Bystander But keep doing what you are trying. I might even put down my laptop and go and have a look! Bring the laptop!...
  • User AvatarRoger Billins 19th Nov - 3:29pm
    Paul Barker. It may be helpful if the powers that be learn from the mistakes and stop making them. That’s what happened in 1983 and...