Three ways bloggers regularly beat traditional journalists when it comes to reporting standards

The usual complaint is from mainstream / traditional journalists that bloggers don’t meet standards of reputable journalists. However, there are three respects in which I think that bloggers repeatedly show higher and more ethical standards than mainstream journalists.

First, honesty about where a story has come from. Too much of the traditional media still uses twee phrases such as “it has emerged” as code for “one of our rivals has reported that…”. In comparison, it’s pretty rare for the source of stories taken from other outlets not to be acknowledged by a blogger, complete with a link.

Second, transparency over re-writing. There is a lot of variation amongst bloggers as how they deal with mistakes, stories that fall apart and so on, but again compared with traditional media it is much more common to see an open and transparent approach, with the use of strike through in particular.

This is one area where the traditional media are catching up as, on their websites you increasingly do see notes about subsequent edits or revisions. However, there are still many stalwart hold-outs against admitting that a story was changed. Oddly, the BBC News website is one of these. Although the BBC has generally been pretty good when I’ve approached them about an error, for example, the correction has always been made ‘invisibly’ with no way for someone to know that a change has been made.

Thirdly, a grown-up attitude to reporting opinion polls. Different polling companies have different methodologies so it’s sensible to compare like with like and look at the shift in support compared with the previous poll conducted by that polling company. What isn’t sensible is to ignore a previous poll done by the same company just because it was published in a different media outlet and instead go for a little game of make believe where you compare your poll with the previous poll you paid for, as if the rest of the world doesn’t exist.

Possibly the bizarrest display of this at the moment is over at The Independent, where the same firm is used to provide polls for both the Sunday edition and the Monday-Saturday one. Except that if it is published on a Sunday, the previous Monday-Saturday one is ignored when printing vote change figures, and if it’s published Monday-Saturday, the previous Sunday one is ignored.

Again, if you want high standards that inform the reader – bloggers beat traditional journalists time after time when it comes to giving sensible context for polls.

The traffic isn’t all one way when it comes to comparing standards, and there’s plenty of variations amongst both bloggers and traditional media – not to mention overlap between the two – but there’s plenty traditional journalists could, and should, learn about presenting information clearly and usefully.

UPDATE: I should have included a fourth key area: bloggers usually give much more prominence to corrections that mainstream media. On blogs, a prominent post that’s wrong gets corrections in that prominent post usually. In the printed media, a prominent story gets a correction buried away in a much less prominent location frequently.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIan 7th Dec - 1:49pm
    We are still targeting way too many seats. Our objective should be - as the party says - to deprive the Tories of a majority,...
  • User Avatarmarcstevens 7th Dec - 12:59pm
    Thomas - on what you say about the trains I wholeheartedly agree with you. I was toying with the idea of having them run by...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 7th Dec - 11:49am
    Peter, this paper is a little academic http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue64/Fiebiger64.pdf but discusses the appropriate use of sectoral financial balance analysis, much in the way the Wynne Godley...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 7th Dec - 11:09am
    Simon So you’re happy with IPSO? If not, what do you propose?
  • User AvatarJonathan Fryer 7th Dec - 11:01am
    For me one of the most significant outcomes of the otherwise often discordant NATO Summit was the acceptance by all 29 member states that China...
  • User AvatarGlenn 7th Dec - 10:46am
    Re Climate Change The problem isn't a couple of extra large TVs. It's the things no one wants to tackle, Air travel, too many cars,...
Tue 10th Dec 2019