Vince hits out at Gordon’s ‘Big Tentism’

Lib Dem deputy leader Vince Cable has delivered a typically withering-yet-courteous assessment of Gordon Brown’s determination to assemble a ‘government of all the talents’.

Speaking at a Fabian Society fringe meeting at the Labour party conference in Bournemouth, he’s quoted by the BBC saying:

“I am concerned about what I would regard as big tentism – this attempt to get everybody into the same fold. I think it is an attempt to create – in the nicest possible way – a one-party state.”

He likened Mr Brown to Jomo Kenyatta, former president of Kenya, for whom he once worked and who engaged in big tent politics.

“It was about sucking out of opposition parties any potential source of dissent – giving them a role; giving them a state regardless of colour or tribe or ideology,” he said.

“It was superficially very attractive but ultimately it is dangerous because it destroys constructive opposition and we are very concerned about it for that reason.”

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Yasmin Zalzala 25th Sep '07 - 8:53pm

    It seems to me that this rhetoric should be directed to the many senior liberal democrats who accepted positions in Gordon Brown’s ‘big tent’.

  • Yup, Vince puts his finger on it well.

  • Interesting to see the BBC report Angela Eagle saying Labour have to learn from us on tax. Are we winning the argument here?

  • Geoffrey Payne 26th Sep '07 - 1:18pm

    The test for Gordan’s tent, or anyone else’s, is whether they can agree with the policies that Labour are putting into effect. I wonder if Labour can deliver on reducing carbon emmissions with Digby Jones keen to persue the business interest agenda?
    I do not object to Lib Dems getting involved with the Labour government assuming that they are pushing our agenda. If Brown decides to cross swords with them, they could resign and make him look very silly, so I think that Shirley Williams in particular will have some clout.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
  • Peter Martin
    @Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
  • Gordon Lishman
    When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...
  • David Murray
    Typo: I first joined the Liberal Party in November 1966, almost 60 years ago this year !...