Waltham Forest recount: judge to report to election court

The result of the election recount for High Street ward in Waltham Forest is now expected to be announced early in September.

The recount took place in private last Friday before a judge at the High Court after a member of the public spotted a potential error at the original count on May 6. It was thought that 1,000 votes may have been mistakenly added to each of the Labour candidates’ tallies.

If this was the case, it would have led to Labour’s Steve Terry being elected instead of Liberal Democrat Mahmood Hussain.

From the Waltham Forest Guardian:

The judge is now expected to draft a report for a specially constituted election court, which will then declare the result.

The votes for elected Labour councillors were announced on May 7 as follows: Liaquat Ali (3,322), Clare Coghill (3,185) and Steve Terry (2,932). But their actual votes could have been 1,000 less each, meaning votes cast for Liberal Democrat Mahmood Hussain (2,043) would have exceeded Steve Terry’s by 111 votes.

In May the Liberal Democrats sent an election petition to the High Court.

Waltham Forest Council said the result of the recount is not expected to be announced before the end of August.

The result of the May election still stands until the election court declares its decision.

The council said that all those present at the hearing last week were required by the court to sign a secrecy declaration not to disclose anything about the hearing until the result is officially announced or they will be in contempt of court.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Steven
    I believe I am correct in stating that Germany's system was actually designed by us and that we imposed it on them after the war. At one time it was a unique sy...
  • Steven
    If the London Assembly system was more of a proper AMS/Mixed Member PR system as Germany's Bundestag system is with its allowance of overhangs and therefore wit...
  • Steven
    One of the tests that should be used to evaluate a good PR system is how does it treat parties with less than 10 percent support but which still have more suppo...
  • Chris Moore
    @ Angie Robertson: the article is about the complaints' system. And is correct in pointing out the time and energy devoted to trying to resolve complaints. No s...
  • Tad
    Great article, much needed. It's very easy to take the side of friends over faceless bureaucrats....