From the Belfast Telegraph, watch the Cleggster speak at a Conference in Bath about social mobility and Brexit:
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings
Subscribe
-
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
It’s my party and I’ll lie if I want to – Gray report (Andy Boddington)
-
Robb Elementary School shooting – will America ever get a grip on guns? (Andy Boddington)
-
We must protect Britain’s liberal democracy from the Conservatives (Jack Meredith)
-
Caroline Pidgeon writes…Elizabeth Line: Much to celebrate, but much to learn as well (Caroline Pidgeon)
-
UBI can be Achievable and Affordable (Natasha Chapman)
-
The Joy of Six 1052
-
Will officers take the rap for Liverpool Political incompetence?
-
My tweets
-
PM must hand minutes of Sue Gray meeting over to Privileges Committee
-
Harris Academy Parent Council meeting #dundeewestend
-
How long can Johnson survive as Prime MInister?
-
The Conservatives used to hate Winston Churchill
-
The Willow Brook flows through Leicester to the River Soar
-
Cost of living crisis gets worse
Recent Comments
George Thomas
The alleged ABBA party wasn't investigated because Sue Gray stopped investigating when the Met (previously uninterested in looking into the matter) started to i...
Roger Lake
My comment not far above is meant to suggest what may be thought too long-term -- certainly more than one General Election, since the first stage of National In...
Roland
The Gray report adds to the question to the police - given the grounds on which members of the public were fined the maximum fine of £10,000, why weren't these...
Barry Lofty
[email protected] I would like to believe that the country might think the Tory Party itself have played a large part in the lowering of respect for the politicians entr...
David Raw
B.A. de Pfeffel J. is the biggest political rascal in Downing Street since David Lloyd George - but without the compensating charisma, intelligence, political s...
29 Comments
Nick’s quite right to say “local government is paralysed by the cumulative effect of very very steep reductions in funding for local government”.. I agree with Nick.
What he didn’t say, “between 2010 – 2015 The Government reduced its funding to local authorities by an estimated 28% in real terms between 2010-11 and 2014-15. Further planned cuts will bring the total reduction to 37% by 2015-16″…..
National Audit Office Report, 14 November, 2014
I’ve a funny feeling that the Cleggster was there at the time and had something to do with it ……. maybe he didn’t notice. I was a Councillor for some of that time, trying to channel funds into the increasing demands of social care…….. and I certainly did notice.
Unless something is done soon, the existential crisis facing local government will just accelerate. Central government has got to stop using local government as a human shield and yes I’m afraid to say that David Raw is right in his analysis.
David and John are absolutely right. I remember a meeting I attended as our council’s finance portfolio holder in London where the Lib Dem LGA had a meeting in 2012 and I told our minister that the proposals being put forward by Eric Pickles were a disaster, and he needed to raise it with Nick and the rest of out team because the Cons were destroying our one area of great strength.
I could say, sadly, that it was Nick and coalition that turned out to be the waste of time, but it was much worse than that. It almost totally destroyed us.
Stephen Hawking said “I deal every day with complex mathematical problems. Please don’t ask me to help with Brexit”. Theresa May laughed.
If Brexit is (at the v least) a monumental waste of time, why did you help mainstream the idea of holding the in/out referendum Nick?
@Paul Pettinger
“If Brexit is (at the v least) a monumental waste of time, why did you help mainstream the idea of holding the in/out referendum Nick?”
I was under the impression that Nick and the Lib Dems blocked any idea of a referendum during the Coalition years. Are you saying I am misinformed, Paul?
Simon – All Lib Dem MPs bar Nick voted for the referendum. So whether they supported it in 2008, 10 or 13 is a bit moot.
I feel sorry for the Lib Dems…Every time Nick Clegg pops up he reminds the voters who would be inclined to ‘lend’ you their vote of the dreaded Coalition years…it isn’t helping is it.
@Simon Shaw – I have seen a very nice leaflet with Nick’s face on – in the run up to the Lisbon Treaty – noting that “It’s time for a REAL referendum on Europe” calling for a referendum on EU membership.
The people on the street are sick and tired of the games politicians play – whether or not they are in coalitions.
wg – I think at the time of Lisbon it was the right time for a referendum. There were already too many lies becoming embedded in the nation’s consciousness and they needed to be opposed, then. It would have allowed a real discussion to be held and issues raised about the EU’s problems (and there are many) which could have been addressed.
By 2016, the extra time for those lies to be further embedded and the fact that the problems with the EU had not been addressed, added to by the impact of austerity and coalition, made it much more difficult to connect with people for Brexit. In essence it was all left too late to build a consensus, and it left us totally polarised as a nation.
I see the usual suspects dredging up their anti Clegg sentiments.As a Council leader (sometime ago now) there has always been pressure on Councils but the Coalition was right for the first five years to shake the tree and force local government to face its financial position. The point that Nick is making that , once the fruit has fallen you cannot keep shaking that tree. Local Government has increased responsibilities and they should be properly funded. BUT the costs of Brexit are on the Governments mind , so local serices will continue to be starved of resources o pay for it.
@OnceALibDem
“Simon – All Lib Dem MPs bar Nick voted for the referendum. So whether they supported it in 2008, 10 or 13 is a bit moot.”
I don’t follow you. 2008 was pre-Coalition. If you are saying that Lib Dem MPs supported it in either 2010 or 2013, how come it didn’t take place until June 2016, a good year after the Coalition ended?
I repeat that I was under the impression that Nick and the Lib Dems blocked any idea of a referendum during the Coalition years.
Yes, in coalition Liberal Democrats certainly did block any moves towards a referendum. It was a frequent complaint amongst Conservative party headbangers. I think this excuse rather suited Cameron at the time. Many believed that Cameron had hoped for a continued coalition with reduced Lib Dem participation, but enough to enable him to shelve his referendum.
The compromise was the bill about a referendum in the event of Westminster powers ceded to EU bodies.
There is speculation that this bill may come back to bite the Tories in their Brexit negotiations, the result of which will inevitably cede powers to EU institutions, without representation on those bodies. By law this should trigger a referendum.
@BRANDO
“I feel sorry for the Lib Dems…Every time Nick Clegg pops up he reminds the voters who would be inclined to ‘lend’ you their vote of the dreaded Coalition years…it isn’t helping is it.”
Very much the opposite, actually. Yes, a minority of voters regard 2010 to 2015 as what you call “the dreaded Coalition years” – so we are most unlikely to secure their votes. However a majority of voters regard 2010 to 2015 as having seen a responsible, competent and non-extreme government.
That’s in distinct contrast to (1) the present Conservative government under May or any plausible successor, or (2) an alternative Labour government under the dreaded/dreadful Corbyn, McDonnell and Milne.
It’s not about referendums, it’s about local government funding and the legacy of 2010-15. End of.
@Simon Shaw “a minority of voters regard 2010 to 2015 as what you call “the dreaded Coalition years” … a majority of voters regard 2010 to 2015 as having seen a responsible, competent and non-extreme government.”
Do you have the evidence to support “majority” and “minority”?
In the 2015 General election the two coalition parties combined secured 44.8% of the votes (down from 59.1% in 2010). Similarly, the Conservatives saw their share of the vote rise from 36.9% in 2015 to 42.4% in 2017 after 2 years of governing alone.
It is not apparent that a majority of voters saw the Coalition as a good thing.
I’m 74 and started taking a serious interest in politics and world affairs in the 1960s. I’ve seen the ups and downs, the crises, the rise and fall of political parties and movements. I can honestly say that I have not seen the world in such a shambles. What is currently going on in these islands is bad enough; but add that to the tendions around the world and I can almost feel myself wishing for the Soviet Union to come back. At least, in theory, you thought you knew then who the enemy was! But, wait a minute. Isn’t that what Vlad and his mates are trying to do?
I have a lot of sympathy with John Marriott’s Cassandra-like comments. A “serious interest in politics” reminds us that we need more serious politics – not less. Abolishing politics is clearly Putin’s ambition with parallels in Washington and Beijing – and of course Mrs May’s election pitch inviting us to vote for her rather than any policy choices. Yet I still believe in politics as an honourable vocation!
Simon, your stock response seems to become pedantic rather than look at a bigger picture. Voters made up their minds on the coalition years ago. We have kept on testing the coalition record at the ballot box. In contrast to our time in Government in Scotland, it has always (from May 2011 onwards) consistently failed. That’s not anyone’s opinion, but the reality. Why do you want us to be a coalition enthusiasts club when – regardless of whether we love the coalition era or not – it objectively does not provide the Party with a legacy and voter base to sustain it having more than a peripheral impact on national politics?
What was said by Nick in the clip is exactly right.
The idea of a second referendum was first promoted by James Goldsmith in the early 1990s. (He died not long after.) Perhaps if it had happened then, Remain would have won easily. So for a period after LibDems were in favour of a referendum, but this was later nuanced to having a referendum if the UK government proposed giving more powers to the European Union, as happened in some other EU countries; so that was the policy pusrued by the coalition. Tony Blair was quite bullish about the EU, but Gordon Brown’s almost clandestine visit to Lisbon to sign the treaty was a low point.
@Paul Pettinger
That doesn’t really address my query to you as follows:
“I was under the impression that Nick and the Lib Dems blocked any idea of a referendum during the Coalition years. Are you saying I am misinformed, Paul?”
That was a genuine question on my part. I thought that Nick and colleagues had “vetoed” any such idea (which isn’t to say that Cameron wasn’t delighted when they did so) but I might be recalling things incorrectly.
It’s just that if my recollection is correct, then your original comment (“If Brexit is (at the v least) a monumental waste of time, why did you help mainstream the idea of holding the in/out referendum Nick?”) is genuine bizarre.
If my recollection is incorrect, please accept my apologies.
@Ian Sanderson (RM3) “… but this was later nuanced …”
Unfortunately the party’s approach comes across as though Lib Dems only want to give people a say if people say what Lib Dems want to hear. 🙁
You might think that, Peter,…. I suspect any politician would like to go into an election or referendum with real hope of strengthening their position.
On that accounting the 2016 referendum was a political and personal tragedy for David Cameron (and also for Theresa May).
By the same reckoning, not having a referendum between 2010 and 2015 was a win for the whole country.
There is an article in today’s Telegraph:
Europe’s crisis deepens as intellectual opinion turns, and Italy is where it all ends
This is a ‘premium’ article – so I will give some quotes in case any readers do not subscribe to the paper:
“Europe’s political uprising is shifting to a second front. Once-silent intellectuals are starting to challenge the core assumption of EU ideology, indicting the project for moral vandalism and a reckless attack on the democratic nation state.
It is almost as if a counter “doxa” is emerging in the cultural capitals of the Continent. Theorists and professors are proclaiming the virtues of the nation – the precious liberal nation, inspired by the universal and redemptive values of the French and American revolutions – in a way we have hardly heard in recent times.”
“In the past it has been all too easy for the EU power structure to ridicule eurosceptic dissent as nostalgia, or to blacken it as populist tribalism with ugly undertones – whether the Front National in France, or Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party in the Netherlands. British protest could be quarantined as an Anglo-Saxon peculiarity.”
“Just weeks earlier, Belgian historian David Van Reybrouck issued a withering broadside on similar lines, comparing EU’s high-handed treatment of member states to the “colonial administrations” of the Belgian, Dutch, British, or French overseas empires in the inter-war era. These regimes had their show-piece “councils of the people” but real power resided in a remote imperial executive, while repressed anger seethed below.”
https://www.libdemvoice.org/watch-nick-clegg-say-that-brexit-is-a-monumental-waste-of-time-56930.html
Doesn’t the weakening of Councils follow the same lines as the weakening of nation states within the EU [and wasn’t this one of the key reasons the Brexit vote was won?].
How does a European superstate – with even less democracy – line up with balancing the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no-one shall be enslaved by conformity?
Sorry – the link above is wrong – it should be:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/03/14/europes-crisis-deepens-intellectual-opinion-turns-italy-ends/
Bob Sawyer, as a Council Finance portfolio holder (until quite recently) I can categorically state that “the Coalition was *not* right for the first five years to shake the tree and force local government to face its financial position. Eric Pickles, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, agreed to Local Government submitting to much greater cuts than almost every other area of government so that he could get an early place on their Star Chamber that determined where the cuts would be made. Civil Service departmental cuts were much smaller. But we did nothing to stop him.
Bearing in mind that local government was our one area of real strength, the fact that we let the Conservatives sacrifice it to further their own agenda, showed political incompetence of the highest order.
Iain (and Simon), I’m afraid Nick began calling for an in/out referendum in early 2008: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/25/eu.liberaldemocrats. Soon after three of our front bench spokespersons were compelled to resign so they could support having a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty (they were under a three line whip to vote against having one): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/mar/05/eu
@Paul Pettinger
Sorry to keep pestering you, Paul, but I really was under the impression that Nick and the Lib Dems blocked any idea of a referendum during the Coalition years.
Any idea whether I’m right or wrong on that?
Simon, I’m not minding you pestering me, though do find your pedantry odd. To answer your question, Cameron didn’t actually want a referendum, so I don’t think there was a serious prospect of one in the Parliament before last. However, I don’t think we should feel too satisfied about ourselves for having (again) flipped our position on a referendum when in Government as, by that stage, we had unwisely helped mainstream the crazy idea and as we were pursuing stagnatory economics and had broken a lot of trust (giving cynical voters more reason to turn to those offering alternative answers), which helped further create the conditions for the Brexiters to win.