What is the Lib Dem position on ‘The Big Society’?

I was called by a colleague I know through my day-job last week: ‘What is the Lib Dem position on charitable giving?’ she asked. Beyond a bland ‘We’re in favour of it,’ I found myself a bit stuck for an answer.

Initially I put it down to my ignorance, and decided I should do some research, call a few people up, and find out something a bit more helpful, a bit more substantive. But coincidentally that day I happened to read this article — How can charities exert an influence on Lib Dem policies? — in Third Sector.

And it turns out that it’s not just me who’s a bit stuck for an answer. The party is as well:

The party has no minister in the Office for Civil Society, which sets much voluntary sector policy, and its conference papers make no mention of the government’s big society agenda. It is difficult to know where the party stands on key issues, such as public service reform, commissioning and the government’s role in encouraging charitable giving and volunteering, because it has not appointed a spokesperson on the sector.

Clues can be found in Community Futures: Policies on the Voluntary Sector and Volunteering, a 38-page document published in March, now adopted as Liberal Democrat policy. Many of its proposals match the government’s agenda: it supports impact measurement, deregulation, social banking and reform of the vetting and barring system. It also pledges that “in future we will require all legislative proposals to include a voluntary sector impact statement”.

Baroness Liz Barker, who chaired the policy group that produced the report, says the group has not arranged any discussions of sector policy at the conference. Asked whether she thinks the report has influenced government policy, she says: “I don’t know, really.” She stresses that it is Liberal Democrat, not coalition government, policy.

And I was particularly struck by the following paragraph:

One party member, who works for a charity and asks not to be named, says: “At a national level I don’t think the Liberal Democrats have had a huge impact on the big society agenda. It feels like it has been driven by the Conservatives. It was always David Cameron’s idea.” Asked how optimistic he is that Barker’s proposals will be implemented, he says: “Not very.”

As I explained to my colleague on the phone, this policy lacuna is an odd one for the Lib Dems to have. The concept of ‘The Big Society’ taken at face value — bottom-up initiaves, leveraging volunteer networks, community self-empowerment, collective action not reliant on the state — is an eminently liberal one.

The fear has always been that in the Conservatives’ hands it is little more than an excuse for government to abdicate responsibility. All the more reason, therefore, for Lib Dems to ensure our voice is a strong one, helping shape ‘The Big Society’, and for liberals to reclaim it. To date, though, our suspicion of its Tory authorship and marketing seems to have precluded our drive to make it work for our liberal vision.

‘How to make it happen?’ That was the question on my mind as I put down the phone, slightly embarrassed that I was unable to give a more convincing answer to my colleague’s straightforward question on charitable giving. Your thoughts, please…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Tony Greaves 21st Sep '11 - 2:20pm

    I am not sure that “charitable giving” has too much to do with the Big Society. An interesting thing is that the House of Lords has now had more than a dozen sessions discussing the Localism Bill and the words “Big Society” have hardly been uttered since Second Reading. Are they (the words) going out of fashion in high places in government?

    The Federal Policy Committee commissioned a paper on Localism some time ago., There have been several versions of it prodeuced and discussed and rejected or deferred. Whether one will now appear for next spring is an interesting question. This all says a lot.

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • George Thomas
    "I wonder how many voters in any of the recent by-elections have quoted attacks on devolution and breaking down of relationship between different nations within...
  • John Roffey
    Since this article is about plain speaking - I came across this 'most liked' post in the comments section of an article by Nigel Farage in the Telegraph: "I ...
  • Hireton
    Mandate The Scottish parties which support a referendum gained seats at the 2021 Scottish General Election and the UK parties which oppose it lost seats. Th...
  • John Roffey
    I thought this short video from the Dalai Lama provided much needed hope on Climate Change: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i52NqV00Os...
  • Brad Barrows
    @ John Barrett Yes 60% of Scottish exports go to England under the current arrangement of Scotland in the UK but not in the EU. Most Irish exports used to be w...