Saying something highly uncomplimentary about your own party is one thing. Saying it, denying it and then having a recording surface of you saying it is rather different though. Step forward, Hazel Blears and her “wicked and malicious” comment:
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Gaza (Tom Arms)
-
The Lib Dem strategy review (Rob Blackie)
-
Fergus McClelland was the last illegal major British child actor
-
Labour and the Liberals in 1924 and today
-
Family: Scene Through the Eye of a Lens
-
Brexit: The Uncivil War - the TV drama with Benedict Cumberbatch
-
A power vacuum?
-
HMO plan for Market Harborough's Bottom Club
-
I am liberal, woke and proud of it. We should all accept such descriptions with pride
-
The Joy of Six 1539
-
When the GIs came to Swansea
Recent Comments
Caracatus
The thing is we can have lower taxes (for most) and better public services. The madness of the lost war on drugs which cost billions. Sorting social care, th...
paul barker
Can London build its way out of this crisis ? Londons population has gone up by more than half since the 90s & all the "Plans" are for it to go up more. Lo...
Steve Nash
I agree with KP that the International Aid and diplomatic Budget should increased, to challenge both Immigration and the need for Defence. It may not be the ch...
Tom Arms
@ John Kelly: I certainly didn't mean to imply that Gaza is peaceful. Sadly, civilians continue to die, humanitarian conditions remain appalling and Israel cont...
Dav
For example, as a Liberal, I believe it is justified to force adults to wearing seatbelts in cars as I believe the restriction on individual freedom is justi...


5 Comments
Nailed.
My contempt for that woman just keeps going up and up.
The saga continues:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11444657
I have some sympathy for Blears, because as per usual Neil garbled the information (and continued garbling it after he’d heard the tape). Blears referred to “stuff that’s gone on in our party,” not the actions of the government, which was what Neil had asked her about. It’s fairly obvious that she was relating to infighting between party factions, not the actions of the government.
I’m no fan of Blears, but I have a little sympathy for her on this. It may have been naive to think she was speaking to a closed meeting, when she criticised her own party’s culture, but she was right to criticise it. And so my opinion of her has gone up.
Lovely. Whether one’s estimation of her goes up or down for admitting some of the things that were going on in the party were wicked and malicious and she disliked that, I do love it when politicians out and out lie about something they said and then can be shown to be lying. Not shading the truth, or obfuscating it, or making an honest mistake; an out and out untruth. Stephen Norris had an even more hilarious one I believe.
‘It’s fairly obvious that she was relating to infighting between party factions, not the actions of the government.’
She still lied about who she was talking about in order to score a minor political point about the coalition, which was a great big lie – she should have just admitted she, like many, was unhappy about the infighting that had been going on, but that they kept quiet about it, and in fact denied it ever took place at the time, in order to retain a stronger image for the food of the party – and I do not believe that she forgot who she was talking about in the slightest.