Saying something highly uncomplimentary about your own party is one thing. Saying it, denying it and then having a recording surface of you saying it is rather different though. Step forward, Hazel Blears and her “wicked and malicious” comment:
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Scottish Lib Dems defeat SNP on Learning Disabilities, Autism and Neurodivergence Bill (Caron Lindsay)
-
How housebuilding can tackle the cost of living crisis and boost growth (Rob Blackie)
-
The Independent View: Nobody falls in love with a manifesto (James Bradford)
-
Bridges Matter (Francis Chubb)
-
For disabled people, a simple game of football comes with a terrifying price tag: their benefits (Jean-François Burford)
-
Bishop's Castle Town Council sees the importance of supporting residents during a food crisis
-
Assembly Rooms toilet row - Ludlow council "not a bottomless pit"
-
Former Green Mayor Ian Conlan joins Lib Dems
-
The Manchurian Candidate (the 1962 version)
-
The Red Lady of Paviland
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Retro.1
-
The Joy of Six 1599
-
Europe's coffin-makers warn Chinese imports could be death knell for industry
-
Reform leader of Leicestershire County Council under pressure
Recent Comments
cim
I would have thought one of the biggest barriers to buildings getting built is the supply of materials and the availability of competent staff to turn those mat...
Pawel Urbanski
This subject needs far more attention and more noise from Liberal Democrats, particularly in London. Rob’s direction is right, and the report is useful. But w...
Peter Davies
London is a special case. There wasn't enough undeveloped land without planning permission sold to get an accurate figure. What matters is what developers think...
Tim
@peter - Land prices have not been rising, at least in London, for ages. The idea that developers string out negotiations is hard to sustain in the context of t...
Jim Webber
I spent 17 years in London. Nothing speaks louder about the problems affecting this country than the closure of key bridges in our country's capital. The closur...
5 Comments
Nailed.
My contempt for that woman just keeps going up and up.
The saga continues:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11444657
I have some sympathy for Blears, because as per usual Neil garbled the information (and continued garbling it after he’d heard the tape). Blears referred to “stuff that’s gone on in our party,” not the actions of the government, which was what Neil had asked her about. It’s fairly obvious that she was relating to infighting between party factions, not the actions of the government.
I’m no fan of Blears, but I have a little sympathy for her on this. It may have been naive to think she was speaking to a closed meeting, when she criticised her own party’s culture, but she was right to criticise it. And so my opinion of her has gone up.
Lovely. Whether one’s estimation of her goes up or down for admitting some of the things that were going on in the party were wicked and malicious and she disliked that, I do love it when politicians out and out lie about something they said and then can be shown to be lying. Not shading the truth, or obfuscating it, or making an honest mistake; an out and out untruth. Stephen Norris had an even more hilarious one I believe.
‘It’s fairly obvious that she was relating to infighting between party factions, not the actions of the government.’
She still lied about who she was talking about in order to score a minor political point about the coalition, which was a great big lie – she should have just admitted she, like many, was unhappy about the infighting that had been going on, but that they kept quiet about it, and in fact denied it ever took place at the time, in order to retain a stronger image for the food of the party – and I do not believe that she forgot who she was talking about in the slightest.