Willis challenges Mandelson over student places funding squeeze

The Telegraph reports:

Students are facing a desperate scramble to get into university amid warnings of a further squeeze on places. … On Wednesday night, Phil Willis, the committee’s Liberal Democrat chairman, wrote to Lord Mandelson to ask how he would meet the huge demand for higher education triggered by the recession. It represents Lord Mandelson’s first test since taking over the new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in the Cabinet reshuffle.

Student leaders have already warned of looming chaos as thousands of teenagers leave school and college without university places or employment. By April this year, almost 525,000 people had applied to start full-time undergraduate courses, compared with 480,000 a year earlier. More are expected to apply by the end of June deadline. But as the economic downturn put a squeeze on public finance, ministers announced only 10,000 additional places would be funded. Analysts predicted the settlement would leave at least 30,000 students without places. …

In his letter to Lord Mandelson, Mr Willis said: “It appears that the 10,000 extra places… has translated into only an additional 3,000 vacancies for full-time undergraduates. Three thousand places is approximately the equivalent of an increase of about one per cent but we gather that demand for places in England is running at 9.7 per cent higher than at this point last year.”

The remaining 7,000 places are believed to be turned over to postgraduates and part-time students, while some money will be spent by universities who recruited too many undergraduates last year.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Meanwhile, Vince Cable is on record as saying that the Liberal Democrats would cut student numbers to fund ‘free education’ for a small elite. In that context the limit on additional student numbers wouldn’t appear to be too controversial as far as Lib Dem MPs are concerned…

  • I agree with Johnny: Phil appears to be saying something sensible, and flatly contradicting the party’s completely illiberal line that the state should decide how many students are allowed to go to univ.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ John Marriott "Back in the days of the run up to GE ‘97, Paddy Ashdown thought he had Blair on his side regarding voting reform. However, when the latter...
  • John Marriott
    Could we possibly drop the adjective “progressive” for starters? “Alliance” would do for me. I agree with Brad Barrows’ sentiments. It HAS to be a com...
  • Tristan Ward
    Yes liberals should undoubtedly advocate free trade. It makes both sides of the trade richer than they would otherwise have been, bringing wealth to the poo...
  • Paul Barker
    This article is both confused & confusing. There is No possibility of any Electoral pact with Labour (unless Labour back Electoral Reform ) & I dont se...
  • Alex Macfie
    John Marriot: One knows that the resignation of Stephen Phillips as MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham was genuinely principled by the fact that he did not stand...