That seems to be the implication of Labour’s education secretary’s interview in the New Statesman, where he says:
For Balls, defeating the Tories is the top priority. Given this, what is his advice to Lib Dem supporters in the 100 or so Tory-Labour marginals? “I urge Lib Dem voters to bite their lip and back us.” But what about Labour supporters in Tory-Lib Dem marginals? “I always want the Labour candidate to win, but I recognise there’s an issue in places like North Norfolk, where my family live, where Norman Lamb [the Lib Dem candidate and sitting MP] is fighting the Tories, who are in second place. And I want to keep the Tories out.”
A nod’s as good as a wink, and all that. Clearly Ed Balls is signalling his tacit approval for tactical voting by Labour supporters to help Lib Dems against Tories.
Of course whether his real motivation is to help the Lib Dems, or to position himself as a less tribal figure than he’s generally characterised in advance of a Labour leadership election, is a moot point.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Temporary Traffic Order - Westfield Lane
Farmageddon ****
Two Fortean tales from the 1915 Quintinshill rail disaster
Press: Legalising cannabis can reduce violent crime
David Copperfield, by Charles Dickens
The will of the people has changed: great film from the farm of a Lib Dem PPC
How Johnson's Brexit deal is worse for the UK than May's
Ian Sanderson (RM3)
Paul Walter
frankie
Ross McLean
Roland
9 Comments
That would be Norman Lamb then?
I am sure Ed Balls would be perfectly comfortable supporting his fellow Norwich City fan
Ed Balls is 50% right, but of those 100 Lab-Con marginals Labour must lose those where they lead by less than 6%, eg Finchley, or they would retain their Commons majority. Lib Dems should be voting Tory in these seats.
Of course, it could just be that Balls is so lacking in anything that might resemble a political principle that his only motivation is hatred of the Tories.
Balls and Hain have come out as tactical voting MCs!
Given that they are Labour’s slipperiest public spokesmen it is tempting to dismiss almost everything that comes out of their mouths. Surely they cannot be serious! But they are. They are truly desperate. They must believe Labour’s election campaign has reached terminal velocity. An they have come to the conclusion that it is time to apply the after burners.
Unfortunately their desperate play to marshal the anti-Tory vote will simply add accelerant to the blaze of Labour’s electoral vanities.
Personally I would vote tactically for Labour – albeit with a ‘Chirac peg’ on my nose – if I lived in Corby (like my inlaws) or Clacton (like my parents). I fear – real FEAR this – that the Tories will win.
If Balls really wanted to help, he might have mentioned SOUTH Norfolk where, despite coming a steady third for years, there were still 13262 Labour voters in 2005. Richard Bacon, the Tory MP, would be dead meat if about half of them voted Lib Dem. In North Norfolk , which he cites, we will win easily anyway.
My (clearly too obscure) point was about the ‘Noman’ in the headline.
Cynics might suggest that Balls’ newfound embracing of tactical voting might not be entirely unrelated to his own precarious position.
@Neil – oh, dear. Maybe Bacon=dead meat was too obscure, too, then!