LibLink: Andrew Duff – Europe gripped by UK election

Over at the Financial Times, Lib Dem MEP Andrew Duff offers a European perspective on the UK’s general election – and finds the continent as gripped as the rest of us by Thursday’s national poll:

In Brussels and across Europe there has been a surge of interest in the British general election campaign. People had more or less accepted that David Cameron would form a Conservative government, probably with a large majority, but now the outcome looks far from certain. …

Yet the thing that has galvanised continental political interest is the exposure of the iniquity of British electoral procedure. That Mr Brown could come third in terms of the popular vote yet still retain the largest number of seats in the Commons, and return as prime minister, is thought to be scandalous. Indeed, if such a result were to be declared in any benighted east European country, MEPs would pass cross resolutions about corruption and the abuse of fundamental rights.

Whatever comes out in the wash after May 6, a change to a system of proportional representation in Britain, where seats won at Westminster broadly match votes cast in the country, is a precondition for the rehabilitation of Britain’s reputation as a democracy.

You can read the rest of Andrew’s article here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and LibLink.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Paul McKeown 4th May '10 - 9:59am

    But what is http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0e6bd692-56ef-11df-aa89-00144feab49a.html all about?

    Needs explanation, surely electoral reform is a Liberal Democrat sine qua non? Surely NC is talking purely about giving confidence and supply to a credible minority government, or is more intended?

  • Paul McKeown 4th May '10 - 10:32am

    Yes, I understand and accept the four pre-conditions; they promise a better future for the country. I don’t understand, though, how this article talks about dropping one of them. LD’s should give NC, his front-bench and the parliamentary party as much manoeuvring room as they need, but surely this makes no sense?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 29th May - 2:14pm
    On 19th November, just over six months ago, (the full text is on LDV), Ed Davey announced : "The Resolution Foundation have proposed a new...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 29th May - 2:05pm
    Peter Martin, taxes are settled predominantly by payment from private bank accounts i.e. bank-created money. How money is created is also explained by the BofE...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 29th May - 1:26pm
    "Money is not the issue, the government can spend almost as much as is required to get us through this crisis and it doesn’t HAVE...
  • User AvatarPhilip Moss 29th May - 1:06pm
    Please clarify is our Foreign Affairs Spokesperson advocating the granting of BNO passports to more Hong Kong residents? How many is he talking about? How...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 29th May - 1:02pm
    @ Joe, This is a useful explanation of "the pyramid of liabilities" which has central bank money at the top, which has total acceptance, with...
  • User AvatarGlenn 29th May - 1:00pm
    Maybe Dominic Cummins, Professor Ferguson and other high profile lockdown flouters (like the press door stepping them) don't believe in the dire warnings they dish...