Chris Huhne and Nick Clegg have submitted their answers to five video questions posted on YouTube and selected by Acting Returning Officer Chris Rennard. Today’s answers are on the first bill the candidates would introduce as Prime Minster.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Winning Britain’s Cities: A Liberal Vision for Urban Britain (Patrick Stillman)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Canada (Tom Arms)
-
Remember why we started: What the Hong Kong Alliance case means for Hong Kongâs future (Arthur Wu)
-
Are the Liberal Democrats invisible? (Veronica-Mae Soar)
Wells to Walsingham: The world's smallest public railway
Funding Political Parties
Government says it won't tackle election turnout blindspot
The ongoing cost of Brexit
Recent Comments
David Allen
"According to the headline in yesterdayâs âDaily Telegraphâ (28 August) : âEd Davey refuses to rule out Tory pactâ." More deafening silence! Well,...
Peter Hirst
If the political make up of the eu changes significantly would we be better to have stayed in? It probably depends whether you are more interested in global or ...
Mrs Rita Baker
I agree with everything in this post. We need a national message as well as local ones. As I am currently disabled, waiting for a hip replacement and knee opera...- Peter Hirst
An agreement with other countries to coordinate action when their interests collide would be a useful addition to the array of groups, organisations and bodies ... - Peter Hirst
Our political strategy as I understand it does not make it easy for us to have a single message that gives us the publicity we need. We can talk about empowerme...
4 Comments
đ This is really not getting any easier!
Honestly, how will we ever get these two to agree on anything? đ
For the first time in this campaign someone has said something which has impressed me.
I was pretty unhappy in the “90 days” debate that our MPs went along with the doubling of the detention without trial without really looking at whether a strong case was being made for that increase.
Chris seems to be saying he would propose reversing this and taking it back to 14.
Not a finance or localizing bill then – how disappointing!
The Freedom Bill may be sexy, and I agree that it’s necessary, maybe even an “easy win”, but I’d prefer a radical marker of change like devolving massive amounts of power and responsibility to local government.
I suppose one could argue that such would take a long time to draft where a Freedom Bill is just potentially a list of things from the last ten years to be repealed, but I do think that if we are serious about some of our policies on complex issues such as localism we ought also to have definite proposals set up in advance that are well enough worked up as part of our offering to the public to be able to table them on day one of any putative Lib Dem government.