Chris Huhne and Nick Clegg have submitted their answers to five video questions posted on YouTube and selected by Acting Returning Officer Chris Rennard. Today’s answers are on the first bill the candidates would introduce as Prime Minster.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
We do have a two tier system, Part 2 (Neil Hickman)
-
A Federal Britain: 3. Fiscal Federalism and a complete constitutional settlement (Iain Donaldson)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Liberal Voice for Women poll doesn’t say what they say it says (Tanya Park)
-
Alison Suttie writes: Thank you to our volunteers (Alison Suttie)
-
The Joy of Six 1529
-
Blondie: Sunday Girl
-
Liz Saville Roberts to Give the David Lloyd George Memorial Lecture at Gwyl Cricieth Festival
-
Richard Rhys O'Brien Gives Talk on Margaret Lloyd George - Photos
-
Labour deputy claims that Farage is a threat to democracy
-
Knaptoft: The very heart of England
-
Remembering Liz Truss and her dogs that barked at drones
-
We do have a two-tier policing system but it is not what our homegrown racists think it is.
Recent Comments
theakes
A new strategy/approach requires a new leader...
Kira Collins
You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
Peter Martin
@Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
Gordon Lishman
When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
Roland
@nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...
4 Comments
😀 This is really not getting any easier!
Honestly, how will we ever get these two to agree on anything? 😉
For the first time in this campaign someone has said something which has impressed me.
I was pretty unhappy in the “90 days” debate that our MPs went along with the doubling of the detention without trial without really looking at whether a strong case was being made for that increase.
Chris seems to be saying he would propose reversing this and taking it back to 14.
Not a finance or localizing bill then – how disappointing!
The Freedom Bill may be sexy, and I agree that it’s necessary, maybe even an “easy win”, but I’d prefer a radical marker of change like devolving massive amounts of power and responsibility to local government.
I suppose one could argue that such would take a long time to draft where a Freedom Bill is just potentially a list of things from the last ten years to be repealed, but I do think that if we are serious about some of our policies on complex issues such as localism we ought also to have definite proposals set up in advance that are well enough worked up as part of our offering to the public to be able to table them on day one of any putative Lib Dem government.