10,000 new members since polls closed last Thursday!

phoenixWe’re entering nosebleed heights. Here’s what Austin Rathe, from party HQ, just told members:

This is absolutely incredible: since last Thursday, 10,000 people have joined the Liberal Democrats to begin the fight back.

Here’s some of the reasons they gave for joining:

Charity from Edinburgh said, “I joined the Lib Dems because Nick Clegg was right in his speech – we need liberal values now more than ever.”

Emily from London, “Just joined the @LibDems – because I think we’re going to need them a lot over the next few years.”

Adam from Hastings, “What I feel the country needs is movement towards co-operative, evidence based politics. That’s why I joined the @LibDems.”

You, or your friends or family, can join here. And you can pick from a choice of a dozen photo membership cards – including all sorts of leading figures from our party – past and present. My daughter recently rejoined and chose the membership card with the photo of Lloyd George and Churchill, because it was “cool”.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

52 Comments

  • It seems we lost to the Tories during the coalition but we’re certainly winning members now because of them and their proposed policies.

  • I’ve got the Churchill one too 🙂
    10045 now.

  • Joseph Toovey 12th May '15 - 8:27pm

    Has someone got a link to pictures of these membership cards? They sound great.

  • People could conclude that there is really a problem with the voting system in the UK from this, maybe?

  • A photograph of Churchill?

    Would that not be almost 100 years too late?

    I cannot remember the exact date but I think he joined the Conservatives in the 1920s and fought every election from that time onwards as a Conservative.

    Can anyone confirm the last time he stood as a Liberal ?

  • May I suggest that those of us who were members before last Thursday increase our subscriptions if we are in a position to do so? We need to keep as many HQ staff as possible.

  • Trefor Hunter 12th May '15 - 9:14pm

    Rather than ‘THE FIGHTBACK’ why don’t we have LIB DEM Bounce Back?

  • Why is there no coverage at all of this in the national media? When the Green Party were having their membership “surge” we had daily stories about how amazing it was. And we get nothing.

  • Jane Ann Liston 12th May '15 - 9:32pm

    I was thinking the same thing, MBoy. It was the same when the SNP membership took off post-referendum; it was in all the papers. I wonder how many of our new members are north of the Border?

  • @MBoy – it’s made the Torygraph online!

  • Are these numbers from the Lib Dem party machine like the comfort polling numbers they also produced?

  • I have heard it mentioned on TV.

  • I lost my membership card. I want one of these snazzy ones. 🙁

  • This is great, but the new members will expect the party to respond too, by embracing positive change.

  • Churchill lost his seat as a Liberal in 1922, stood unsuccessfully twice in 1923 as an Independent, then won in 1924 as a Conservative in Epping.

  • In 1924 it was actually as a Constitutionalist, but he had backing from the local Conservative Party.

  • There doesn’t appear be a slowdown of the flow of new members yet.Labour has claimed 20,000 new members since the election, and I think the Greens have claimed 1300 on polling day itself. On an even spread our 10,000 is about 15 per constituency, but I’m sure it won’t be even.

    In my area (Bedford) we’re having a get-together on Saturday so I’ll ask how many new recruits we’ve gained.

  • Winston Churchill stood as a Liberal for the seat of Leicester West in the 1923 general election (6 December), and lost. It was the last time he campaigned as a Liberal; his entire Liberal career lasted just nineteen years (1904-1923). By the end of 1924 he was effectively a Conservative.

  • John Roffey 13th May '15 - 6:46am

    Paul Walter

    The implications so far on LDV is that the new members – since the GE are truly new – rather than returning.

    Are none of these returning members – perhaps in the hope or expectation that the Party will now return to its former left of centre roots?

  • Paul

    Thanks. I was actually familiar with that picture, which in its cropped form cuts out Margaret Lloyd George.

    Of course the picture could have been cropped to show Mr and Mrs Lloyd George and removing Churchill. Margaret was after all a loyal Liberal activists who did much in the constituency to firm up support for the party as well as being married to LG.

    I think if we are to rebuild the party the he best way to do it is not by celebrating a famous (perhaps the most famous) Conservative in a photo on our membership cards.

    BTW — my membership card does not have a photo on it. It has these words —

    “The Liberal Democrats exist to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society,
    in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community
    and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity”
    Preamble to the Constitution.

    It could of course have been worse. The picture could have been of the police sent by Chruchill to South Wales in 1910 to sort out the miners. A precedent for Thatcher’s use of the police in mining communities the 1980s.
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonypandy_Riots

    I just checked back on this and have read a fascinating contemporary piece in The Guardian of 1910 praising Churchill because at least he did not send in the troops with bayonets. So only a few dozen miners ended up in hospital having been beaten with truncheons.

    So Churchill was not as bad as that other Tory the Duke of Wellington who sent in the troops to massacre people at Peterloo. I assume we are not going to have the Duke of Wellington on membership cards in the future?

  • Stephen Hesketh 13th May '15 - 7:16am

    John Roffey 13th May ’15 – 6:46am

    John, the narrative appears to be that Nick Clegg and those who were staunchly loyal to him were right all along … the new members are the Clegg cavalry … We appear to be still in denial.

  • Alisdair Calder McGregor 13th May '15 - 7:38am

    Given that they are Liberals, I’m sure there’s as many reasons for them joining up as there are new members (if not more), including both those who wouldn’t join while Clegg was leader & those who are devastated that he has gone.

    Let’s not assume anything other than that they want the Liberal Democrats to succeed – an attitude we should all be cultivating as far as we possibly can!

  • Alisdair Calder McGregor 13th May ’15 – 7:38am
    “….Given that they are Liberals, I’m sure there’s as many reasons for them joining up as there are new members (if not more), including both those who wouldn’t join while Clegg was leader & those who are devastated that he has gone.”

    Well said Alisdair. You are absolutely right. We need them all, old and young, brand new and those who now feel able to return from exile because they recognise that the party needs them.

    Our party president has something of a platform in the media now that we have a leadership election.
    If she could be saying the same sort of thing as you it would help to rebuild the party.

  • @Roffey and @Hesketh the obvious thing to do is survey them to find out. Plus I’m sure HQ has stats on who’s new vs who’s rejoined

  • @David-1 but he effected much greater peace time change in those 19 years than he did as a Conservative. He left the Liberals when they imploded through factional infighting; the Lloyd George faction sought to expel the Asquith faction if I recall correctly.

  • I have heard little but praise about Nick Clegg from people around me who are not necessarily Lib Dem supporters. He’s a sad loss to the wider political stage but hopefully only temporarily. Our rise in membership has been mentioned numerous times in the media as had that of the Labour party with claims of 40,000+ new members.

    I agree that one of the first things we need to do is protect the party admin structure from collapse. If that means increasing my sub or chipping in a donation I am happy to do that.

  • Jenny Barnes 13th May '15 - 8:49am

    As a member for several years, can I have a membership card? Or are they only for newbies?

  • Stephen Hesketh 13th May '15 - 8:50am

    Alisdair Calder McGregor13th May ’15 – 7:38am
    JohnTilley13th May ’15 – 8:06am

    “….Given that they are Liberals, I’m sure there’s as many reasons for them joining up as there are new members (if not more), including both those who wouldn’t join while Clegg was leader & those who are devastated that he has gone.”

    Well said Alisdair. You are absolutely right. We need them all, old and young, brand new and those who now feel able to return from exile because they recognise that the party needs them.

    Our party president has something of a platform in the media now that we have a leadership election.
    If she could be saying the same sort of thing as you it would help to rebuild the party.

    100% agreement with you both.

  • @Robert I think many people are with Joni Mitchell on this.

  • Stephen Hesketh 13th May '15 - 8:54am

    Regarding membership cards, I would like to suggest that we actually issue new cards carrying the phoenix symbol and the words from the preamble cited by John Tilley

    “The Liberal Democrats exist to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity”

    The preamble and the phoenix should serve as a point of common cause to us all.

  • Paul
    Put up the picture of ‘Churchill the dog’ from the TV insurance advertisements.

    You know you want to. 🙂

  • I think you’ll find that the rush of new membership has a very simple explanation. Members who apply before June 3rd, (close of nominations), get to vote on the leadership. Curiously, do you have the facility to check (between now and 3rd June), that the new 10,000 are actually liberals, and are not members of another party?

  • Jonathan Pile 13th May '15 - 9:25am

    It’s great to see the 10,000 new members – the Phoenix has risen and the great liberal movement is on the march again. But let us remember the 4,420,360 voters we lost from 2010. The simple reason for that loss was the party’s shift to the Right under Clegg and it’s unbalancing and loss of trust . Any future leader like Tim Farron must ensure a balanced broad party of the SLF, Orange Bookers and the welcome new 10,000 Libdemfightbackers. @libdemfightbac

  • John Roffey 13th May '15 - 9:32am

    TCO 13th May ’15 – 8:13am
    “@Roffey and @Hesketh the obvious thing to do is survey them to find out.”

    Office – just trying to ensure objectivity and balance – so important at the start of any new endeavour.

  • John Dunn 13th May ’15 – 9:25am
    “I think you’ll find that the rush of new membership has a very simple explanation. Members who apply before June 3rd, (close of nominations), get to vote on the leadership. ..”

    Which is not a privilege open to UKiP voters or members like you John Dunn. Unless of course Mr Farago has resigned again today?

    I know he resigns on Fridays and Sundays and then returns on Mondays but what about Wednesdays.?

    Or are you all too excited about Mr Carswell turning down £600,000 of public money? It is fascinating to watch a party with only one MP suffering division in the ranks.

    I guess Mr Carswell chairs the UKIP parliamentary party and the UKIP back-bench committee so once he has had a meeting with himself this split will be glossed over.

    Or he could refer it to the leader of his party who said he would resign if he did not become an MP, all, depending on which day of the week it is.

  • Jane Ann Liston 13th May '15 - 10:12am

    @John Dunn ‘I think you’ll find that the rush of new membership has a very simple explanation. Members who apply before June 3rd, (close of nominations), get to vote on the leadership.’

    Except, Mr Dunn, that the rush started right after close of poll, well before the leadership timetable, or eligibility to vote, was announced.

  • John Tilley: The membership card still has the all-important bits of the preamble on it, it just has the picture of Churchill & Lloyd George as well. While I take the point that Mrs LG was a better Liberal, I have found the major advantage of having Winnie on there is that it REALLY annoys tories.

    Alisdair: spot on, as usual.

  • @John Roffey I see we have some stats now and over 4/5 are new, leaving less than 1/5 being the returning disgruntled, welcome though they are.

    I hope we welcome them and embrace their ideas and views and don’t indulge in “death by Focus”.

  • @Jennie there is a story of Churchill meeting a new Labour MP in the fifties. The MP introduced himself and explained that he wasn’t a conservative. Churchill replied “I’m a Liberal. Always have been; always will be.”

  • matt (Bristol) 13th May '15 - 11:23am

    Spot on comments above – I am finding that I agree with Jennie Rigg a lot … I have no idea whether she approves of me, but I approve of her.

  • Tom Barney 13th May ’15 – 11:41am
    “…Violet Bonham Carter, who was friends with Churchill to the end of his life, believed that he was never really a Tory. ”

    Tom,
    I think Violet Bonham Carter believed more things before breakfast than I could manage in a decade. 🙂

    BTW – I agree with your line of thought in your recent blog where you mention GK Chesterton. He had interesting views on Churchill, didn’t he?

  • John Tilley writes :
    “Which is not a privilege open to UKiP voters or members like you John Dunn.”
    As long as the name on the cheque, matches the name on the membership card,.. I guess it doesn’t matter who votes? I just want my vote to count, and I can’t decide yet whether to vote positively or tactically.

  • Yeah! People are making jokes again, making me laugh. That’s a true characteristici of the Lib Dems, laughing in the face of adversity. No other party does this. Also having many different strands of belief. Much better than quarrelling and disappearing into the vortex of factionalism. I really love the Phoenix logo and hope we can adopt it very soon.

  • SIMON BANKS 13th May '15 - 5:18pm

    John: Wellington wasn’t personally responsible for Peterloo. Asquith had Tonypandy.

    The surge in members is genuine. I really hope, though, a good proportion become activists. We need to connect the volunteers of 2015 with local parties and ongoing campaigns. We were gaining members steadily during the later years of the coalition and we often heard during the OMOV debate and elsewhere that most of them were nationally recruited, but none of my constituency’s new members of that period would even reply to a welcoming e-mail asking them what they were interested in. None turned up to select a candidate, even for a parliamentary by-election. None responded to action day mailings. There was one guy who did get stuck in, but he was locally recruited. Clearly, though, the party nationally did attract some keen, inexperienced volunteers for the general election campaign and welcoming them to local campaigns is vital.

  • Simon
    Wellington was a reactionary of the worst sort.
    Perhaps you and I could agree that Churchill was personally responsible for Gallipoli?

  • @ John Tilley
    “Duke of Wellington who sent in the troops to massacre people at Peterloo.”
    “Wellington was a reactionary of the worst sort”

    Wellington was back in Britain by 1819, but it was the magistrates who called in the regular army and the local Yeomanry. I am not aware of his involvement in Peterloo, I think he was only Master-General of the Ordnance at the time.

    This is of course is the same Wellington who as Prime Minister brought in Catholic Emancipation in 1829.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    " In fact, most rich people employed clever tax avoidance experts to create and find loopholes, and thereby dodge their tax bills." Isn't this justification ...
  • Chloe
    Mick; Debate and discussion lead to a majority of just 23. There's very strong opinions on either side. And parliamentarians should not be giving out emotive ex...
  • David Allen
    Simon McGrath, "@Mick Taylor “in my youth some people could pay up to 98% on their income above a threshold. People talked about leaving, but few ever did....
  • Jana
    Many years ago, prior to wearing seatbelts became law, my mother was in a multiple car crash that she only survived due to not wearing a seatbelt - she was thro...
  • theakes
    Surely the final decider is if the Ban saves lives or ofteenagers being in A & E with cut wrists etc after their impact with social media. Everything else ...