Lib Dem Council leaders slam decision to end remote meetings

During the pandemic local Councils have been permitted to hold formal meetings online, and this has enabled them to carry on Council business through lockdowns and other restrictions. The Government has now announced that this ruling will be withdrawn after 7th May and Councils will have to meet in person after that date.

This is quite bizarre in the short term because meetings are not permitted under current Covid rules. According to the roadmap, from 17th May groups of 30 will be allowed to meet outdoors, but only 6 indoors.  The earliest date at which meetings could be held indoors would be 21st June. In stark contrast, Parliament will continue to allow remote attendance until 21st June.

But it is also worrying in the long term, since the current practice has made it possible for councillors and members of the public to attend meetings even when they could not physically attend easily for reasons of health or disability.

Some 90 Lib Dem Council Leaders and Opposition Leaders have signed an open letter to Robert Jenrick MP, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, and to Luke Hall MP,  Minister of State for Regional Growth and Local Government. Here is the text of their letter:

Dear Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP & Rt Hon Luke Hall MP

We write to you as Liberal Democrat Leaders and Group Leaders on councils across England. The government’s decision not to extend legislation allowing councils to meet flexibly after May 7th 2021 is wrong and should be reversed as a matter of urgency.

Local councils across the country have worked hard to ensure that virtual meetings are accessible and inclusive, with many examples of increased public participation since their inception. We take the public health of our residents, employees, and elected members very seriously, and have grave concerns over the practical and health implications of what the government is proposing. Praising the work of local councils in your letter as “magnificent” is meaningless if poorly thought-through decisions such as these are dictated to local authorities, with zero consultation or input.

And we know this opposition extends beyond our party – we agree with the Conservative Chair of the LGA who has been very clear in his statement: “This decision is extremely disappointing. The Government’s own roadmap out of lockdown states that indoor gatherings or events – organised by a business, charity, public body or similar organisation – cannot be organised until May 17 at the earliest. Yet councils will be unable to hold remote meetings from May 7. MPs will retain the right to participate remotely until at least June 21 but the powers-that-be in the House of Commons will not make time available to legislate for councillors to do the same.”

We call on you to allow councils to choose on this matter and are happy to meet with you or your officials to discuss how this can be done.


(90 signatories)

We have also been sent a quote from Cllr Howard Sykes, who is the Leader of the Lib Dem group on the Local Government Association. He writes:

In February we saw the Tories say that it was too dangerous for Councillors to deliver a leaflet outside, despite being masked up and following COVID safety rules in the fresh air, but it’s now ok to cram councillors into a hot crowded council chambers – this decision is absolute madness.

* Mary Reid is a contributing editor on Lib Dem Voice. She was a councillor in Kingston upon Thames, where she is still very active with the local party, and is the Hon President of Kingston Lib Dems.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Kay Kirkham 1st Apr '21 - 5:51pm

    When remote meeting was first allowed, a quorum of my village council met in the car park to make appropriate amendments to the standing orders. As a vulnerable individual I did not attend. I now have to look forward to meeting in the same car park. Not sure that the wall is long enough for all of us though.

    Complete madness of course. All councils should be allowed to make their own arrangements.

  • So how many councils are proposing to stand up and tell the government that they are going to ignore their announcement?
    If the LibDems want constitutional reform then need to start voting with the feet and not simply cow tail to the whims of Westminster…

  • Simon Gamble 3rd Apr '21 - 10:27am


    Tempting though it is just to go ahead with remote meetings, it would leave council officers and other staff in an unacceptable position. Should they be expected to act on decisions taken at the meetings if those decisions can later be declared illegal in court?

    Yes, we should do as much as we can – alongside other parties – to get this decision reversed but we shouldn’t be asking council staff to get involved.

  • @Simon Gamble
    Yes, we should do as much as we can – alongside other parties – to get this decision reversed but we shouldn’t be asking council staff to get involved.

    At this stage – with a little over month to go, all that is necessary is for Councils (elected members) to stand up and tell Westminster of their intent and publicly refuse to back down…
    When it comes to the event, I suspect the simplest way around the ‘legality’ issue is for the ‘offical’ council meeting to simply rubberstamp the decisions made in the Zoom meeting, an arrangement that can be formally established now.
    The question is do councils have the backbone and moral will to challenge or simple be content to mutter into their drinks and meekly comply.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Mick, I spent some time living and working in Australia. Until I actually got around to applying for, and getting, Aussie citizenship I wasn't allowed to v...
  • Nonconformistradical
    As I understand it every adult US citizen or resident is required to complete a tax return every year. We don't do that in UK - e.g. if someone just receives in...
  • Mick Taylor
    Most, if not all, people who have come to the UK to live, pay taxes, here in the UK. It's only filthy rich people who get away with claiming non-dom status. Lab...
  • Andrew Tampion
    Peter Watson: "but the impression was left that the nett figure was still a big one with little explanation of the good things it bought us." That is because t...
  • Simon R
    @Nigel I don't see it as at all irrelevant if a person maintains a right to vote in another country. One person one vote is a fundamental principle of our democ...