Adonis declares end of the road for road-pricing

From today’s FT (well worth reading today for other reasons):

The government will “definitely not” proceed with a national road-user charging scheme if it wins the next election, the new transport secretary has said, in the most comprehensive renunciation so far of a policy adopted in 2004. …

In July 2004, Alistair Darling, then transport secretary, committed the government to a national system of pay-per-mile charging . The scheme was intended to replace charging for road use via taxes on fuel. As cars become more fuel-efficient, taxes produce less revenue per mile driven and any deterrent effect of tax on car use reduces, increasing congestion. The 2006 Eddington report on transport policy said a national road-user charging system could provide benefits of £28bn a year by 2025. However, the government has cooled markedly on the policy since early 2007, when 1.7m people signed a petition on the Downing Street website opposing it.

“We will definitely not proceed with a national road-user charging scheme in the next parliament,” Lord Adonis said after addressing a conference organised by Transport Times, the trade newspaper.

Road pricing remains very much established as Lib Dem policy – just under a year ago, Lib Dem shadow transport secretary Norman Baker launched the party’s transport programme, Fast Track Britain: Building a Transport System for the 21st Century, with its declaration that “Liberal Democrats propose a motorway and trunk road pricing scheme covering all motorways and major trunk roads in Britain.”

However, when LDV polled our readers (who may or may not be Lib Dems, of course) the proposal to introduce road pricing proved controversial, dividing readers. In the end, 47% opposed its introduction while 43% supported it, with 10% undecided. With Labour now coming out firmly against it, it really does look like the end of the road for road-pricing.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Thank goodness now I just hope we follow suit and drop our policy supporting this ridiculous idea

  • Good riddance to a really bad idea.

  • Tony Greaves 27th Jun '09 - 12:18am

    Good for Adonis. Now we can drop the daft and dangerous idea.

    Tony Greaves

  • If we are serious about shifting people from roads to public transport then some road pricing schemes are going to have to be part of that mix on congested trunk roads and in urban areas.
    It must not, though be used as a substitute for investment and expansion for buses, trams and rail or for the changes in planning and land-use that make cars so essential for too many people.

    What we are right to oppose is a blanket, all-seeing-eye road charging project as originally proposed by Labour. Such schemes must be targeted and locally sustainable

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 14th Jul - 2:24pm
    This is NOT a competition! Comparing countries surely only works if statistics are compiled in exactly the same way in EVERY country. I would add...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 14th Jul - 1:59pm
    @ JoeB "At full employment, current spending (including depreciation) should be financed by tax receipts and investment spending financed by long-term bond issues." There's a...
  • User AvatarFrank West 14th Jul - 1:54pm
    The interesting question is how many excess deaths there would have been if there was no lock-down but over 65's and those with relevant medical...
  • User Avatarsuzanne fletcher 14th Jul - 1:26pm
    not very good that the one re free school meals was embargoed till 10 pm the night before ( no idea why) and next morning...
  • User Avatarn hunter 14th Jul - 1:09pm
    2nd best pandemic prepared country in 2019. So what did happen from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 beside Johnson's sad win at the polls (we...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 14th Jul - 12:36pm
    The author makes a valid point about the plight of pensioners who retired overseas. Back in the 1970s there were many fewer such pensioners and...