ALDC’s by-election report – 17 December 2015

ALDC Master Logo (for screen)There were two second place finishes for Liberal Democrat candidates in this week’s six principal council by-elections. In Brent (LB), Sarah Dickson recorded an 8.7% vote share increase for the Lib Dems in Kensal Green as the party polled 23.9%, with Labour holding the seat with 53.4% of the vote. There was another second place for the Liberal Democrats in East Hertfordshire (DC). Rob Lambie polled 19.5% in Hertford Heath ward, with no Lib Dem candidate having stood there in May.
The winning candidate was due to represent the Conservatives, but following a problem with their nomination papers, appeared as ‘no description’ on the ballet paper. A similar issue befell the Liberal Democrats in Ryedale (DC), as they polled 10.2% to finish fourth in Derwent, although the party didn’t officially appear on the ballot. The Liberal Party went on to gain the seat from the Conservatives.

In two previous by-elections this week, the party polled 6.5% and 11.1% in Conwy (UA) and Spelthorne (BC) respectively, as the Conservatives held both seats.

Elsewhere, the Conservatives secured a gain from Health Concern in Stourport-on-Severn in Worcestershire (CC). The Tories won by just 8 votes, increasing its vote share by 9.2% from two years ago. No Lib Dem candidate was fielded in this contest.

In addition, the Liberal Democrats came second in a by-election on Machynlleth Community Council in Powys. Lee Catterall polled 28.3% of the vote as he finished behind an Independent candidate.

The final by-election of 2015 will take place next Wednesday, with Julian Newman standing for the Liberal Democrats in the Aylesbury Vale (DC) ward of Grendon Underwood & Brill.

For a detailed list of last week’s results please click here. If you would like more information on all the forthcoming by-elections and details on who to contact for help, click here.

* ALDC is the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors and Campaigners

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • I have been looking at the changes in our vote in those seats where we stood both in May & in recent byelections. The average so far is an increase of 10%. If that was reflected in the results next May we would probably make small gains. That would be a massive improvement on the last 5 years but probably not enough to change the medias attitude, that we are irrelevant.

  • Richard Underhill 21st Dec '15 - 7:02pm

    The links have not been copied.
    “For a detailed list of last week’s results please click here. If you would like more information on all the forthcoming by-elections and details on who to contact for help, click here.”
    Should “ballet” be “ballot”?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Paul Baker, The £16,000 limit on total savings for those of working age on benefits hasn’t been changed since 2013. If someone has more savings than this ...
  • Rose Runswick
    I appreciate the concerns here that we are not in the running for this Seat currently, but this has not always been the case, at one stage we were the main chal...
  • Tim Rogers
    I agree. We are not in the running for this seat. However we must hope that Green party do not win. Next year's local elections are going to be truly massive an...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I would not put any national resources into this by election. It looks extremely unpromising, as it will clearly be a two horse race between Labour and Greens. ...
  • Katharine Pindar
    What can be seen as 'progressive' new taxation, for Andy Burnham and his Chancellor to try in order to raise further much-needed funds? Not surely by any means ...