Australian Electoral Commission agrees to “Sex Party”

– a political party, that is!

From The Register:

It’s official: the Australian Sex Party (ASP) is now a bona fide political party, entitled to appear on the ballot paper, raise funds and even – if they gain more than four percent of the primary vote – eligible for public funding.

This follows a long drawn-out tussle with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), after several members of the public claimed that the Party’s name was obscene. In a five-page minute (pdf) that carefully explored the precise meaning of the concept of obscenity and how it related to the electoral process, the AEC decided that the various objections received to the registration of the ASP were outside the grounds on which a refusal might be made.

They did, however, consider objections that the ASP name invoked “orgiastic notions”, with a full analysis of the case and statute law surrounding the subject.

The AEC found that the name itself was unlikely to “deprave or corrupt” voters – the touchstone test for obscenity in both the UK and Australia. They were also swayed by the fact that the party membership forms state that “Sex is deeply rooted in the lives of all Australians. It is relevant to hundreds of pieces of legislation made around the country”, as well as a message instructing members to “Vote 1 for personal freedom and sexual rights”.

In an outbreak of establishment common sense, the AEC therefore ruled: “The name was most likely selected because of the substance and subject matter of many of the party’s key policies, such as the legalisation of marriage for same sex couples, the introduction of sex education into schools, and the listing of drugs used to treat sexual dysfunction on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.”

The Canadian Sex Party – the first of its kind – received 2% of the vote in Canada’s provincial elections in May this year. And single-issue parties such as the Pirate Party with versions in the UK and the rest of Europe, are growing in popularity.

A search for “sex” in the UK Electoral Commissions register of political parties so far only returns the Wessex Regionalists. But with registration with the Electoral Commission costing only £150, are we likely to see a similar party setting up in the UK?

In the UK, independents and single-issue parties are currently less likely to hold the balance of power than their Australian equivalents. How should the Liberal Democrats appeal to would-be voters of such parties, whether Pirate, Sex or those Wessex Regionalists?

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Our invisibility is entirely by design. When we've stood out in the past we could easily have chosen our current strategy. If Ed Davey and Mike Dixon had been ...
  • Simon McGrath
    @miranda “ started badly in 1948 and has continued that route since“ It started with 6 Arab countries invading Israel intent on killing it’s Jewish po...
  • Jana
    “ They may support us but decide that they need to vote for someone else to prevent another candidate from winning.” Of course, tactical voting works bot...
  • David Raw
    Veronica asks, are the Liberal Democrats invisible ? ............................... which is a fair question to put to a political party which seems to focus ...
  • Peter Martin
    "We may not have a shortage of policies" One policy you could add is that of achieving full employment. Keynes, who was also known to be a Lib...