Author Archives: Gareth Lewis Shelton

Join our team fighting for LGBT+ Rights

The new Exec of LGBT+ Lib Dems is now entering its second month. We’ve got an exciting mix of returning experts and new voices, and I’m very lucky to have the opportunity to Chair the team. One of the key objectives that many Exec members discussed in their manifestos back in July, was the need for us to open up and reach out. That’s a priority for me for the rest of our term – and that’s why I’m writing in Lib Dem Voice today.

In our first month we’ve made a good start on the important work that needs to be done, from reviewing our systems and constitution, to getting ourselves organised for Federal Conference in September. We’ve also run our first Pride Inside to commemorate Manchester Pride and Pride Cymru, where we hosted a panel on how the Lib Dems can win back trust amongst LGBT+ voters, followed by an absolutely hilarious quiz.

We’ve also got our first members Pizza and Politics in the diary for 7th September, and are hosting a series of Forums with LGBT+ Councillors (these will initially take place on 3rd and 7th September). I’m deeply interested in what we can practically do to support LGBT+ representatives, candidates and activists, and I hope that these sessions will give us more items for our to-do list!

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    Wealth tax is not nationally relevant. It directly affects a tiny number of people and mostly affects them in terms of the inconvenience of avoiding it. A U...
  • David Warren
    The policy the party should be championing is Universal Basic Income. An idea whose time has come. It's radical and forward thing. Plus with jobs disappearin...
  • Chloe
    Jana is right. I walk through the nearest large town to me and see so many young college/uni students using a cane. These are mostly female and overweight. In ...
  • Mary ReidMary Reid
    The Democrats now need to find a convincing charismatic candidate for President....
  • Jana
    I don’t disagree with anything stated but would suggest that we still appear to be planning to ‘react to unmet need’ rather than asking the more fundament...