Author Archives: Lizzy Tomlin

An informal Lib-Lab pact makes sense – but is it a poison chalice for the Lib Dems?

On paper, an informal Lib-Lab pact at the next General Election makes sense. Whatever you want to call it – informal, non-aggressive, unofficial, secret – an agreement is reportedly in place, and it makes political sense.

It makes political sense as we are in a unique situation. The Lib Dems and Labour have not always been on friendly terms, particularly at the local level where campaigning styles often clash, and in some constituencies and Councils they never will be. Yet at the next General Election (if it takes place in 2024) the Conservatives will have been in power for 14 years, and for all their faults, have arguably played a good electoral strategy and outmanoeuvred Labour and the Lib Dems. If the Tories are to lose their majority, it will require a united front from the opposition to target the voters disillusioned by partygate, failing to see the benefits of Brexit and unlikely to benefit from levelling up.

Labour knows they can’t take on the Tories on their own. They are unlikely to regain seats in Scotland and will face an uphill struggle to win back ‘Red Wall’ seats in traditional Labour heartlands. The Party is also facing huge funding issues, with unions slashing donations, meaning resources are thin on the ground. The Lib Dems on the other hand know they can win traditional ‘Blue Wall’ seats, as demonstrated in Chesham and Amersham and North Shropshire, to take crucial seats away from the Conservatives. And the Conservatives are worried about the local electoral machine that the Lib Dems have deployed in these by-elections. Making a speech at Conservative Spring Conference last weekend, Party Chairman Oliver Dowden said the Tories are “going to have to fight this one seat by seat… doorstep by doorstep” and that it needs “to be reminding people that the best way to tackle the cost of living locally”.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 28 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Rif Winfield
    Putting aside all the financial discussions regarding income and wealth redistribution, and the sheer cost of building those 1,500,000 new homes, which issues a...
  • nigel hunter
    I would not be surprised if the 'NEETS' are steered into the construction industries.There are many jobs in the field from labourer to architect. The social sti...
  • Peter Davies
    Dilnot did not propose a tax but a subsidy. That's how he convinced so many people that such an amazingly unfair proposal was acceptable....
  • Ruth Bright
    Agreed - I think people support it because it's there....
  • Tristan Ward
    @Peter Martin and Jana I think I’m with Jana on this one. The real test of a satisfactory level of income/resources should surely be an amount, taking tax...