Author Archives: Marlowe North

How can I stand in the rain leafleting for a party that does this?

I canvassed seventy-five doors for the Liberal Democrats last Saturday.

I know it’s not a massive number by many politicos’ standards — I mean, I did seven hundred and sixty-nine across the short campaign period last year — but it’s still a decent amount to do on one casualish action day, I think.

And yet, when I watch my partner (our local candidate) trawling through the local rag’s website for things we can use as Focus stories, I can’t help but wonder what I’m doing here.

I am (as far as I’m aware) the only trans member of our local party, and I’m our diversity officer too. I organised and ran the Lib Dem stall at our local pride event this summer, and I spent eight hours wearing my voice hoarse (top tip trans-masc people, it’s a great temporary alternative to T in terms of dropping about an octave) telling attendees that the Lib Dems are standing up for all queer people’s rights. It was a tough day, but it was exhilarating and I loved every second. It was a fantastic way to spend my first ever pride event.

I don’t know if I could do that in good faith any more.

I canvassed seventy-five doors last Saturday because this is the party I’ve signed up to, and because I really truly believe that my partner would be significantly better on the council than the God-awful complacent Labour people currently clogging up this ward. But I did have to slightly switch my brain off in order to do so, because I really don’t know what I would have said if a trans voter had asked me about our party’s policy on their rights.

Now, I know our party’s policy is excellent. We’re in favour of self-ID including a neutral option, a complete ban on conversion practices, and removal of the spousal veto. But at the same time, trans people within the party are not free to be who we are: not if we want to be counted in quotas.

(Non-binary people in particular now don’t show up in gender quotas at all, and it’s not like this can be blamed on the Supreme Court ruling, because non-binary people have never existed in UK law.)

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chloe
    The hubris that was around in 2016 & 2019 is making a comeback. I wonder what's changed for this careerist.... https://x.com/andyburnham/status/806563566...
  • David Evans
    cim, The one thing too many Lib Dems don't understand fully is what is meant by the word balance. That is the key and is the opposite of dogma - which is where...
  • Slamdac
    Sorry I should have said £150,569 after 14 years. It is still a massive amount of taxpayer's money. I think they get paid more than enough. There is only a ...
  • Slamdac
    Any return to Freedom of Movement or the Single Market will require a Referendum of British Citizens, otherwise there is nothing stopping a future Conservative ...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    Oops, Richard Cripps not Roger Billins....