Author Archives: Scarlet Threadgold

The current state of politics can be seen as a turn off for many young people, as policies and government decisions are often skewed towards older generations. The Conservative Party at the last election ran on a policy of national service while improving the triple lock; and Labour, whilst taking some steps to improve the youth minimum wage, still made important services for young people, like bus travel, more expensive so they can pay for another increase to state pension. It’s no wonder voter turnout and interest is only decreasing, and more and more people today are turning to the far right for change. There needs to be change, but that doesn’t come in the form of Farage, but instead in the enfranchisement of voters aged 16-18. 

Some of the policy benefits are very clear. Would there be an increase in bus fares if those who must use a bus to get to school could vote? Would the government cancel large rail projects to pay for road works if a portion of the electorate was too young to drive? For years now, successive governments have created policies which, first and foremost, harm under 18’s because there’s no electoral risk to it. As of right now most young people aged 16-18 have no influence over government, and so nobody speaks for their voice. As a result, modern day politics spends more time and money on pensioners than young people, despite the far greater benefit to the economy and society that young people hold. 

One of the things that young people are often criticised for is their lower turnout in elections, after all 18–24-year-olds are the least likely group to vote, so it appears to make sense to assume 16-18-year-olds to be much the same. However, this is disputed by data from the Scottish independence referendum. Data from the Electoral Commission in 2014 stated that 74% of registered people aged 16-18 turned out to vote, over 20% higher than their 18-24 counterparts. A year later, polling ahead of the 2015 general election demonstrated that 67% of Scottish 16–18-year-olds would be likely to vote in the next election, compared to just 39% of non-enfranchised young people in the rest of the UK. The strength of a democracy comes from the participation of its electorate, and as such, giving the franchise to voters aged 16 and up would work to strengthen our democracy, not weaken it.