Advert

8 Comments

  • For years now, successive governments have created policies which, first and foremost, harm under 18’s because there’s no electoral risk to it. As of right now most young people aged 16-18 have no influence over government, and so nobody speaks for their voice.

    But that’s not right. Young people aged 16-18 do have influence over government, because within at most two years they will turn 18 and be able to pass electoral judgement on the government for what it did during those two years.

    Anyone aged 16 now will be able to vote in the next general election, whether it happens in 2028 or 2028; therefore the government today must pay just as much attention to how their policies affect those who are 16 today as they do to how those policies affect any other voters who will be able to vote at the next election.

  • Would there be an increase in bus fares if those who must use a bus to get to school could vote? Would the government cancel large rail projects to pay for road works if a portion of the electorate was too young to drive?

    ‘Yes’ and ‘Yes’…Those who use a bus to get to work outnumber those using it for school and far more use the trains to get to work than school…

  • Nonconformistradical 18th Nov '24 - 4:34pm

    Following up on Mohammed Amin’s post – do we actually spend enough time listening to young people – asking them what they think rather than making assumptions that they’re not interested?

  • nigel hunter 18th Nov '24 - 9:54pm

    Yes.The future belongs to the young, therefore convincing them we are the ones to vote for is there.More effort should be put into talking to them to learn.

  • Perhaps the reason why young people can be said to have mature views is that they have first hand current experience of answering questions in their education?

  • The age at which people become able to vote is always going to be somewhat arbitrary, but there are good reasons for setting it at 18: 18 is the age at which large numbers of people stop being effectively cared for by their parents and either leave home to go to University, or leave education to start full time work. It’s therefore the age at which most of the population start having to support themselves as adults. That seems a good benchmark for also giving people the responsibility of voting. Is there any comparable change at 16 that justifies giving the vote to 16 year olds but not to 15 year olds? I don’t see one. I think those who want the voting age to be lowered need to answer the question, what’s special about age 16?

  • Peter Hirst 23rd Nov '24 - 2:51pm

    If we can’t become the preferred Party for young people what is our function in modern politics? If our policies do not entice young people to join us then we have our policies wrong. The idealism, vision and clarity that young people bring to political debate can only be admired and copied.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • AM
    It's been slightly odd & nostalgic - this sense of pride and belonging. Very grateful to all those MPs, and to Ed & Josh for leading from the [united] f...
  • AM
    Wholeheartedly agree. It has been refreshing to hear Liberal Democrat leadership and parliamentarians taking a strong and unapologetic stand that is unequivocal...
  • Ben Wood
    It is such sad news. I was lucky to get to know Micheal over the last few years (working on a book project for the John Stuart Mill Institute). He reaffirmed fo...
  • Ed Sanderson
    Very sad news. I remember many a lively evening of erudite discussion in Leeds - Michael was a true intellect - and a genuinely warm soul. My condolences to his...
  • Jack
    This is bang on. What is the point of a liberal party that won't stand up for rights, especially when both government and opposition want to make hay out of div...