Mark Pack

Poll ups pressure on Cameron over TV debates

By | Mon 1st March 2010 - 12:50 pm

I pointed out before that the key to getting a boost in support out of TV leader debates isn’t so much winning the debate as beating expectations: if people expected you to do dreadfully and you come out doing ok that’s almost always a boost to a campaign, whilst being seen as doing ok when the expectations were that you would walk it means you lose support.

So the pressure really is on David Cameron as he’s the one going in to the debates with highest expectations on him according to the latest MORI opinion poll:

Which leader do you expect to gain most public support as a result of these debates, Gordon Brown, David Cameron or Nick Clegg?

Cameron: 53%
Brown: 20%
Clegg: 12%

UPDATE: These poll results are echoed by a YouGov poll:

Leaving aside your own party preferences, who do you think will perform best in these debates?

Cameron: 42%
Brown: 16%
Clegg: 11%

UPDATE 2: ICM have now polled this issue too, with much the same results:

Putting aside your own party preference, which party leader do you think will do best in the debates – Gordon Brown, David Cameron or Nick Clegg?

Cameron: 48%
Brown: 23%
Clegg: 12%

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

4 Comments

  • David 1st Mar '10 - 1:38pm

    Mark the question on here should be why is Clegg on 12%, and why are the Lib/Dems down to only 16% in the polls.

    The talk a few weeks back how much we we grow on the last election?

    So when are you going to come out and ask this question?

  • paul barker 1st Mar '10 - 2:11pm

    David, & others, we have to remember that for most people the election campaign hasnt started yet. Certainly the BBC dont feel any need for balance yet. A lot of voters only remember we exist during the last weeks of the campaign, a big chunk dont who Clegg is yet. In any case the lower expectations are the more people will be pleasantly surprised.
    We all watch the polls but we have to remember that the correlation between them & our actual performance has been very weak. The result for us is wide open.

  • HarryD 2nd Mar '10 - 5:55am

    Paul, still, that 12% is quite disappointing

  • ali al rimmer 2nd Mar '10 - 11:32pm

    Mark,will Nick pretend that he’s making a speech without notes to mimmick Cameron ,whilst having the script beamed on the walls behind the audience or has this been banned?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alan Jelfs
    Well, Zack Polanski and the Greens shows why opening up the eligibility for leadership may not be a good idea....
  • Mick Taylor
    @TristanWard. Growth and doing something about climate change are of course incompatible. I despair that our leaders call for growth rather than the obvious alt...
  • Alex Macfie
    PS The policy document mentions "securing rights to human review and transparency in AI decision-making". This is something that is urgently needed, as anyone w...
  • Alex Macfie
    I took a look at Opportunity's digital policy and it's exactly what the Lib Dems should be saying. https://www.opportunity.org.nz/digital-future See also htt...
  • Mick Taylor
    @DavidRaw. To be strictly accurate, the Church in Wales and the Church in Scotland play no state role since they were disestablished by the 1906-14 Liberal Gove...