Caron’s Sunday Selection: Must-read articles from the Sunday papers

sundaypapsHere’s my selection of stories to infuriate, inform and inspire from today’s Sunday papers. I can’t pick all the stories, so please add your favourites in the comments.

Obviously the fallout rom the Scottish independence referendum dominates. Don’t blame me. Blame David Cameron for using the occasion to pick a fight with Ed Miliband to try and make him out to be anti-English ahead of the General Electiona and, more immediately, the Labour conference. Labour wanted the week to plug their platform for the election. No such luck, it seems. It’s very annoying that Scotland has been caught in the crossfire.

The Independent on Sunday quotes Nick Harvey, Bob Maclennan and Paul Tyler on what they see as the way ahead. Nick Clegg is urged by Harvey to do a deal with Cameron and implement it before the election:

Sir Nick Harvey MP, a defence minister for the first two years of the coalition, said that Lib Dems should agree to support Tory calls for English votes for English laws in exchange for regional reforms. Sir Nick said that this could include more powers for local councils or city regions.

The Lib Dems have long called for decentralisation of political power, and in their 2010 general election manifesto even pledged to help develop regional stock exchanges. Lib Dems complain that the UK is one of the most centralised western states in the world – but whatever the prize, many activists do not want to see another deal with the Tories.

The Better Together campaign, which I’ve previously described as “the worst of Yes to AV combined with the best of The Thick of it,” has its shortcomings laid bare. First of all, the Observer is way too kind about Douglas Alexander’s contribution. They don’t even mention the worst advent in the history of political broadcasting which had his fingerprints all over it, but it does nail down the factional infighting within the Labour party that was one of its greatest weakness:

The Better Together and, to a lesser extent, the wider no campaign was shambolic, divided and, at times, plain incompetent; riven by personality clashes (not only, but largely, confined to within the Labour fold) and inter-party political disputes. It was, paradoxically, often a display of British politics at its worst.

Gordon Brown’s former spin doctor Damian McBride spares no senior Labour figures in the Mail on Sunday:

After Scottish Labour’s poor showing in May’s European elections, Douglas Alexander decamped to Scotland to take charge.

With Gaza, Ukraine, and Iraq in flames, this was no time for Labour’s shadow foreign secretary and 2015 General Election coordinator to take a sabbatical.

But Douglas’s first and last priority in life is himself, and if Scotland was lost, so was his career.

Jim Murphy, shadow minister for international development, is cut from the same cloth. He has a gymnastic approach to politics, adopting any position that will impress the judges.

In an interview with the Sunday Times (£), Jo Swinson says that middle aged women have even less body confidence than teens:

We don’t seem to need to pigeonhole men in quite the same way. Learning to value women beyond their appearance and their fertility is an important part of women being equal in society.

Another former Special Adviser to Michael Gove takes to the pages of the Sunday Times (£) to have a go at Nick Clegg for blocking moves to tackle Islamic extremism. He also criticises Sayeeda Warsi for her role in opposing the measures. I do wish Clegg’s office could actually tackle the issue in their rebuttal, though. This really isn’t helpful:

A source close to Clegg said the deputy prime minister had not heard of Martin and had no interest in his views. “He sounds like a former adviser trying to show off and make a name for himself now he doesn’t have a job,” the source said.

And, finally, we have Desmond Tutu telling Observer readers that we need to look to the fight against apartheid to tackle climate change effectively:

Just as we argued in the 1980s that those who conducted business with apartheid South Africa were aiding and abetting an immoral system, we can say that nobody should profit from the rising temperatures, seas and human suffering caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

We can encourage more of our universities and municipalities, foundations, corporations, individuals and cultural institutions to cut their ties to the fossil fuel industry. To divest, and invest, instead, in renewable energy. To move their money out of the problem and into the solutions. We can urge our governments to invest in sustainable practices and stop subsidising fossil fuels; and to freeze further exploration for new fossil energy sources.

 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • If Clegg goes along with “English votes for English laws” he will have betrayed everything liberalism has ever stood for. EVFEL is not devolution. It is not even a poor cousin of devolution. EVFEL is a subversion of democracy.

  • Tony Dawson 22nd Sep '14 - 8:10am

    Any ‘deal’ should be done with the SNP and Welsh Nationalists and Ulster Parties as well as Conservatives and Lib Dems. It should also be offered to Labour although it is quite clear from listening to Ed Balls this morning that the present Labour leadership’s perspective on the issue is derived entirely from self-interest. It’s all very well for David-1 above to claim that EVFEL is a subversion of democracy. That is not the case. Wasting twice as much state cash on elected representatives to govern one part of Britain and allowing them to vote on other people’s affairs which their electors have no interest in IS subversion of democracy.

  • David – 1 : – Please explain how English votes for English laws is a subversion of democracy. Government of the people by the people for the people ? or Government of other people by other people for the Labour Party ?

    It is sad that so many people in England vote Conservative but they do because they want to whether we like it or not but if the majority of the voters of England do not want Labour Party they should not have it foisted on them because some MPs who are elected by people who are not affected by those policies choose to do so. The SNP MPs do not vote on things which do not affect Scotland. Presumably when they achieve complete self government they will for all intents and purposes be independent . There is talk of them declaring that without another referendum if they achieve a majority in the Scottish Parliament in the 2016 election. Will they still send MPs to Westminster or will they do what Sinn Fein did in 1918 and abstain, except for any Liberal Democrat or Labour MPs ?

    The people of other self governing British territories like the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands have no representation in the House of Commons or as far as I know the House of Lords.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Geoffrey Payne
    I broadly agree with comrade Simon, although the extra problem with raising taxes is that we also have a cost of living crises, so people on low to medium incom...
  • Richard Whelan
    I attended the one on Friday and, like you said Caron, felt that the party really did want to know the views of members. I look forward to seeing what emerges ...
  • David Raw
    Correction : should be "South Africa House in Trafalgar Square"....
  • David Raw
    @ Neil Hickman Thanks for stirring a memory Neil. I was employed at LPO (Party HQ) way back in June 1964, and took part in the massive international campaign...
  • Tom Reeve
    What strikes me about this discussion is what is absent from it. We are debating how to fund services to the last decimal place, and nobody mentions that the we...