Anthony Hook has the story.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- The Falklands are under threat again and we can’t rely on America to save us
- Defining our future in Burnham Britain
- William Wallace writes: The case for higher taxes
- “Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did?
- Britain should confront history honestly, not selectively
Search
Op-eds
-
Four challenges in Andy Burnham’s in-tray (Callum Robertson)
-
A plea to our new Prime Minister – abolish me! (Tim Leunig)
-
Mathew on Monday: Burnham has made a promising start. Now comes the hard part (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Orange with Bits (Brendan Roberts)
-
If Andy Burnham isn’t the Messiah… Good (Roz Savage MP)
-
"Winston and David" on stage
-
The Joy of Six 1551
-
Reform MP starts digging her own Standards hole
-
Kevin Keegan: The humble superstar of the Seventies
-
Labour councillor joins Lib Dems in Portsmouth
-
Andy Burnham's Big Promises - Now Comes the Difficult Part
-
Péter Magyar will ask Judit Polgár to become president of Hungary
-
After Dark podcast on the R101 airship disaster
-
After the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we must all be more careful of the language we use in political life
Recent Comments
John Reed
An excellent overview, thank you Vince. The larger developers do seem to have considerable power to control the housing market. They have land banks, large cash...- John Reed
An excellent overview, thank you Vince. The larger developers do seem to have considerable power to control... 
Alex Macfie
AI can't even judge whether text is AI generated — even deciding something is AI because it uses proper punctuation. My em-dashes are human generated. ——�...- Alex Macfie
AI is indeed massively over-hyped, as @John C and @cim have pointed out. It is a bubble and it will burst, and once the dust has settled AI (or machine learning... 
Peter Davies
@Peter Martin. That is a real problem for those who believe in devolution. Part of the problem is that we have a social services system where local governme...
4 Comments
Very useful post by Anthony. Being falsely accused or threatened with legal action can be very stressful, and it is good to know that we have people willing to help and advise. The Tories threatened legal action a few years ago after we questioned the fact that their candidate (a retired planner, and a current planning consultant) might have an undeclared conflict of interest on planning matters! On this occasion, simply ignoring the threat proved enough, but many on our campaign team had sleepless nights. Get advice as soon as you can. For councillors, ALDC is the place to start, IMO. Certainly, their advice was very valuable to us.
Having been one of those people at ALDC TAG refers to this is a useful reminder. Generally I’d say that the vast majority of threats of legal action against Lib Dem campaigners either had no foundation or were not followed through. The key point is to get advice at an early stage and ALDC or Mark would be the best place to start.
The second point is that a lot of the situations where LIb Dem campaigners want to TAKE legal action are equally ill-founded. Situations like Watford, Miranda Grell and the one Anthony describes are pretty rare. The best thing in almost all cases is to get on with your campaigning or deal with it as “straightforward” negative campaigning on which there is a variety of advice and training sessions.
Injunctions are, as Anthony points out a powerful weapon that can be deployed. They would IME be of relatively limited use as you would almost certainly have to prove that something was at least clearly and demonstrably false for a Judge to consider forbidding a party to put material in an election leaflet.
More than that however is the practical point that if a campaign against you uses injunctable material it is likely to either be used late on or only come to your attention late on. At that point the damage may already have been done and you’d be better spending the time campaigning rather than in court.
are we in a glass house though?
Never, ever get involved with legal processes unless you have exhausted all other possible courses of action. As a young general election agent I was advised by a former candidate (and barrister) to threaten the Labour agent with a writ for libel. He, as a prominent local solicitor, laughed off the threat, and a few years later got his own back by suing me for libel for a relatively innocuous ‘slur’ against a couple of local Labour councillors. Every legal action I have seen in the Party has been disastrous for those involved. If I see something I think is dubious in a Focus I am printing I stop and query it: don’t say it, however angry you are.