Anthony Hook has the story.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- We need a healthy and free leadership debate
- Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for
- What is happening with the Inclusion and Faith Review?
- Ukraine‘s plight means UK must rearm for war now, and not by ten years’ time
- ALDC by-election report, 15th October
Search
Op-eds
-
The defence of International Law in an age of impunity (John Kelly)
-
Social care and the triple lock (Gordon Lishman)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Ukraine‘s plight means UK must rearm for war now, and not by ten years’ time (George Cunningham)
-
Observations of an Expat: Ukraine in Trouble (Tom Arms)
The Joy of Six 1593
Do shouty politicians gain long term votes?
Farage let off Reform staffer accused of racist slur
Recent Comments
Rose Runswick
Thank you for saying this, international law is our best hope for a fairer and more peaceful world, I worry the memory of why it came about in the first place i...
Tristan Ward
Sanctions should absolutely continue, but the idea that Britain should not rearm is to repeat the mistakes of the 1930s. Appeasement is not an option....
Katharine Pindar
Paul Barker: you are right, Paul, in the wider world we do seem largely invisible. That was for instance clear in today's Laura Kuennsberg show when, you could ...
tom arms
The first known use of the phrase "May you live in interesting times" was towards the end of the 19th century when Joseph Chamberlain used it in several speech...
Andy Daer
John is, of course, right to remind us all of the need to uphold international law. Today we've seen Trump congratulate the man he had previously distanced h...
4 Comments
Very useful post by Anthony. Being falsely accused or threatened with legal action can be very stressful, and it is good to know that we have people willing to help and advise. The Tories threatened legal action a few years ago after we questioned the fact that their candidate (a retired planner, and a current planning consultant) might have an undeclared conflict of interest on planning matters! On this occasion, simply ignoring the threat proved enough, but many on our campaign team had sleepless nights. Get advice as soon as you can. For councillors, ALDC is the place to start, IMO. Certainly, their advice was very valuable to us.
Having been one of those people at ALDC TAG refers to this is a useful reminder. Generally I’d say that the vast majority of threats of legal action against Lib Dem campaigners either had no foundation or were not followed through. The key point is to get advice at an early stage and ALDC or Mark would be the best place to start.
The second point is that a lot of the situations where LIb Dem campaigners want to TAKE legal action are equally ill-founded. Situations like Watford, Miranda Grell and the one Anthony describes are pretty rare. The best thing in almost all cases is to get on with your campaigning or deal with it as “straightforward” negative campaigning on which there is a variety of advice and training sessions.
Injunctions are, as Anthony points out a powerful weapon that can be deployed. They would IME be of relatively limited use as you would almost certainly have to prove that something was at least clearly and demonstrably false for a Judge to consider forbidding a party to put material in an election leaflet.
More than that however is the practical point that if a campaign against you uses injunctable material it is likely to either be used late on or only come to your attention late on. At that point the damage may already have been done and you’d be better spending the time campaigning rather than in court.
are we in a glass house though?
Never, ever get involved with legal processes unless you have exhausted all other possible courses of action. As a young general election agent I was advised by a former candidate (and barrister) to threaten the Labour agent with a writ for libel. He, as a prominent local solicitor, laughed off the threat, and a few years later got his own back by suing me for libel for a relatively innocuous ‘slur’ against a couple of local Labour councillors. Every legal action I have seen in the Party has been disastrous for those involved. If I see something I think is dubious in a Focus I am printing I stop and query it: don’t say it, however angry you are.