[email protected]: Sirs Ming & Alan publish their Speaker manifestos

Over at The Times, the two Lib Dem candidates for the position of Speaker of the House of Commons – Sir Menzies Campbell and Sir Alan Beith – set out their manifestos, stating what reforming credentials they would bring to this most historic of offices. Excerpts below:

Ming Campbell:

What is needed is a Speaker who imposes their authority on the House of Commons, not their politics; a Speaker who will stand up for all MPs and when necessary stand up against the Government of the day; a Speaker who will not be intimidated.

The primary purpose of the House of Commons is to hold the Government to account. For too long the procedures of the House have been biased to ensure governments get their business through with minimal inconvenience. The new Speaker should make it clear that the existing rules will be interpreted to ensure scrutiny gets a much higher priority. If the present rules do not allow for that the Speaker should promote rules that do. The Today programme is no substitute for Parliament.

Alan Beith:

Prime Minister’s Questions is seen by many constituents as worse than a school playground. A new Speaker should get backbenchers and party leaders together to discuss how to make it work effectively and rationally. It has different functions, not all of which need to be dealt with through the same procedures: it enables MPs to raise issues affecting their constituents directly and publicly with the Prime Minister. It serves as a test of whether party leaders and the PM can carry the confidence of their own parties in the way they present their case. But as a mechanism for getting real answers to questions and challenging inadequate answers it is hopeless.

You can read their articles in full (together with John Bercow’s) HERE.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Stephen Howse
    It doesn't matter and that result changes nothing in practical terms. Either Labour get a majority, proving they can win under FPTP, and don't implement PR in p...
  • Russell Simpson
    @Jeff Because under PR they'd have a realistic chance of forming a govt, albeit as senior partner in a coalition. With Scotland lost to Labour their chance of ...
  • Russell Simpson
    According to recent yougov polls, if you remove "don't knows", there's almost a 60/40 split in favour of PR. Amongst Labour voters it's even more and amongst La...
  • Jeff
    Labour already have PR with 31.1% of MPs on 32.1% of the vote. It’s hard to see why they’d want to change to a system which would result in their votes and ...
  • Rob Harrison
    Fiona‘s point is pertinent - to compare political parties between countries can be challenging because of different social conditions. But let me make some ob...