LDV readers say: Frank Field for Commons Speaker

Cast your minds back three weeks, and Lib Dem Voice posed the question to our readers, Who do you think should be the next Speaker? Over 1,200 of you voted, and (unsurprisingly) your preferences split many ways – but it was renegade Labour MP Frank Field who topped our poll, with just shy of one-in-five votes.

The four mooted Lib Dem candidates for Speaker – Ming Campbell, Alan Beith, Vince Cable and Norman Baker – together received 41% of the total vote. To date, only Sir Alan and Sir Menzies have confirmed their intentions to stand, today publishing their ‘manifestos’ in The Times.

Of course, since our poll went live other contenders have come forward, including current bookies’ favourite John Bercow, Margaret Beckett, Richard Shepherd, Ann Widdecombe and Sir Michael Lord. Would their inclusion in our poll have changed your minds about who to vote for?

Here are the results in full… LDV asked “Who do you think should be the next Speaker of the House of Commons?”

Here’s what you told us:

• Frank Field: 246 (19%)
• Sir Menzies Campbell: 191 (15%)
• Sir Alan Beith: 189 (15%)
• Diane Abbott: 115 (9%)
• Vince Cable: 94 (7%)
• Ken Clarke: 58 (5%)
• Sir George Young: 53 (4%)
• Sir Alan Haselhurst: 41 (3%)
• Richard Taylor: 24 (2%)
• David Davis: 48 (4%)
• Norman Baker: 52 (4%)
• Sir Patrick Cormack: 21 (2%)
• Tony Wright: 32 (3%)
• Other (please state in comments): 106 (8%)
Total Votes: 1,270. Poll ran: 19th May – 10th June 2009

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Voice polls.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Jul - 9:27am
    @Peter Kenny I wonder if you're responding to the headline, rather than the article. Did you register that the title talks about the hard left,...
  • User AvatarJohn Pugh 5th Jul - 9:02am
    Sharp observers here have picked up on the power of patronage as a device to control dissent when things were going wrong. I used to...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 8:08am
    "Reduce the number of people in poverty by 25%.. " Maybe the Lib Dem constitution should also read "At least 25% fewer people shall be...
  • User AvatarChris Perry 5th Jul - 7:57am
    Care Homes. There appears to have been a lack of understanding of the structure of health and social care from the outset as evidenced by...
  • User AvatarRichard Easter 5th Jul - 6:09am
    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/14/dwp-punishing-low-paid-full-time-workers-under-new-benefits-rule So benefit sanctions are being used to bully those in work as well. The DWP is a rotten cartel of far right thuggery. The...
  • User AvatarTom Harney 5th Jul - 4:04am
    The objectives discussed are not objectives for the party. They might be objectives for the country. We urgently need objectives for the party. What format...