Revisiting Jo Swinson and the Telegraph’s #mpexpenses stories

Remember the Telegraph’s hatchet job on Lib Dem MP Jo Swinson during their series of revelations about MPs’ expenses? (Lib Dem blogger James Graham has followed-up the issue on his own Quaequam Blog! HERE).

Well, on Monday evening, as billed here, I had the chance to put these points direct to the Daily Telegraph’s assistant editor, Andrew Pierce, at a debate posing the question, A triumph for journalism? (You can watch the debate online here – worth watching in full, but the section focusing on Jo starts about 29 minutes in).

The issues of dodgy Telegraph reporting – specifically in the case of Jo, and also those of Andrew George and Alan Reid covered by my LDV colleague Alix Mortimer HERE – is the subject of two in-depth articles by Judith Townend on journalism.co.uk, published today:

  • Telegraph ‘didn’t tell any lies but was selective in its facts’, says Lib Dem Voice site editor
  • Were these MPs’ expenses stories misleading? The screen grabs
  • The article also picks up on an expenses issue we at LDV missed:

    ThisisGloucestershireToday.co.uk reported that the Telegraph had promised to correct a story about a mortgage interest of £1,500 a month, made by Liberal Democrat MP Martin Horwood. The MP denies claiming for any mortgage interest payment.

    This week I spotted something that might perhaps qualify as unique: a letter to a local newspaper which is a fair-minded, well-written and intelligent analysis of the MPs’ expenses situation. It’s well worth quoting in full:

    AMID all the hubbub created by the Daily Telegraph and MPs’ expenses, a few facts stand out.

    1. A small number of MPs seem to have done something that is a matter for the police and the courts.

    2. A larger number of MPs, but still a minority, have done things that are surely not illegal but are to their shame. Their constituents will pass judgment if they dare stand again for election.

    3. Some of the MPs named have clearly done nothing wrong or have made a small mistake that has been grossly exaggerated. They deserve an apology from the Telegraph.

    4. The majority of MPs have not even been accused of anything, yet seven per cent of people in a recent poll thought all MPs were corrupt. Let us hope that none of those seven per cent ever stand for parliament – who would want them in charge of the justice system?

    5. A significant minority of MPs has been campaigning for years to try to clean up MPs’ expenses. They succeeded in stopping a backbencher’s attempt to exempt MPs’ expenses from Freedom of Information legislation. They deserve credit for their efforts.

    There is a tendency for cynical people to think they are worldly wise, but they are not.

    They are gullible, because they will believe anything bad. There are some in the media who seem determined to create cynicism about politicians. Ask yourself why.

    Whatever the final outcome of this scandal, we cannot rebuild our parliament and government on cynicism and disrespect.

    We need urgently to identify the honest MPs, regardless of party, and rebuild around them.

    S Harvey, Hambrook, Bristol.

    Quite.

    Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
    This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
    Advert

    6 Comments

    • The corrupting effect of advertising, media is created based upon what is popular not what is wanted.

      How many people would pay for the metro? I wouldn’t, yet it fuels the celeb culture we live in & I do read it on occasion when I’m bored & bookless.

    • David Parkes 12th Jun '09 - 12:11am

      I love that letter. There is nothing you can add to that apart from a nod of agreement.

      *nods*

    • Roger Shade 12th Jun '09 - 7:58am

      Interesting comments in the Guardian wednesday regarding the Telegraph’s agenda. Was it anything to do with the owners described in the column as’two secretive businessmen tax exiles who have probably denied the taxpayer 10 times the amount of all the MPs illegitimate expenses combined’. Certainly as the column states the reporting was not evenhanded but I disagree that it was designed to hurt Labour most, it was designed to hurt all three of the major Parties and benefited UKIP most.

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • User Avatarexpats 20th Jan - 10:04am
      Stephen Howse 20th Jan '20 - 9:55am.................We need to wait and see who Labour choose as the next leader. If it’s Starmer, Nandy, Phillips or...
    • User AvatarStephen Howse 20th Jan - 9:55am
      Expats - the point is that Corbyn was utterly toxic. The personal approval ratings don't lie and nor do Labour's election results since he took...
    • User Avatarn hunter 20th Jan - 9:47am
      The campaign to remove the 99p,or any other amount should go national. The Brexit economist Mitford seems to think that all we need is service...
    • User AvatarDavid Raw 20th Jan - 9:44am
      I normally find your comments very interesting, David, but sorry, I'm afraid I find your use of the word 'Stalinism' way over the top with...
    • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 20th Jan - 9:33am
      Andrew, there are a number of reasons why someone might want to use a pseudonym. Perhaps they have a job that is "politically restricted". Or...
    • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 20th Jan - 9:23am
      A very sad day. I would like to to add three memories to the tributes above. The first two relate to his well-crafted conference speeches...