Conservatives do badly in last by-election before May 2nd – UPDATED

There was one council by-election yesterday, in the Belle Vue ward for Shropshire Council. This is a long-standing Labour-held ward.

The Liberal Democrats were represented by James McLeod:

Here’s the result:

UPDATE 10:38 26/4/19:

The numbers were:

Labour 603
Liberal Democrats 403
Conservative 152
Green 65
UKIP 58

This compares to these past results:

May 2017 result Lab 643 LD 423 C 362 Grn 67
Nov 2015 by-election Lab 546 C 282 LD 240 Grn 75
May 2013 result Lab 939 C 289
June 2009 result Lab 797 C 571 Grn 161 LD 117

Kevin Alcock, who stood as a Conservative candidate in the 2003 Gedling Borough Council elections, has tweeted a thorough analysis of the result (click on “See Kevin Alcock’s other tweets” to see the whole thread:

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Local government.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Chris Bertram 26th Apr '19 - 9:09am

    Actually it was a *county* council by-election, thought there was a simultaneous town council election in the same area, no idea what the result was there.

  • But what about ourselves, have we moved forward enough to encourage us about next week?

  • TC result:
    GEORGE, Ross Christopher
    The Conservative Party Candidate
    140
    HALLIDAY, Mary Kate
    The Labour Party Candidate
    612 Elected
    LATHAM, David Michael
    commonly known as LATHAM, Dave
    Green Party
    60
    MCLEOD, John James
    commonly known as MCLEOD, James
    Liberal Democrat
    406
    OAKLEY, Robert Donald Ivor commonly known as OAKLEY, Bob
    UKIP
    51

  • I don’t think Labour were going to let this go, the Cllr who resigned (according to Britain Elects) was taking up the post of Labour’s West Midlands organiser, which wouldn’t look good for him starting his new job by losing his old council seat!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Boss 22nd Oct - 6:25pm
    I have just reminded myself of the contributors to the Orange Book and very impressive they are too. We seem far too quick to rewrite...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 22nd Oct - 6:13pm
    @James Kenyon They certainly were, James. My wife and I arrived in Edmonton in July 1970 at the fag end of thirty plus years of...
  • User Avatarmarcstevens 22nd Oct - 6:13pm
    Not weakened enough for my partner's union to ensure she is not forced to work extra hours than those contracted and that rest breaks are...
  • User Avatarjohn boss 22nd Oct - 6:06pm
    In order to maximise support for a second referendum, may I suggest that our leaders make overtures to those who voted leave. We must accept...
  • User Avatarchris moore 22nd Oct - 6:05pm
    Not good enough, George. Quoting from the article you cite. The work for offenders "will include manual labour, improving public areas by clearing up litter,...
  • User Avatarfrankie 22nd Oct - 5:52pm
    Lord Wallace thank you for the reply, but I think the point I raised still stands. We should not be looking to drag regions up,...