When Russell Johnston, that stalwart of liberal democracy, first ran for parliament for Inverness in 1964 he made a point of holding public meetings across the constituency. And when I first met him, in the 1980s, he was still following that old tradition – small gatherings, inviting all-comers to engage in open debate, determined that he could persuade the communities he served so energetically to follow him on the best path for the Highlands.
Over the subsequent years, politics has perhaps lost a little of that traditional engagement. In the modern world where 24 hour news and 140 characters dominant the political landscape, is there still a place for the public meetings which drew not just the dedicated few but whole communities?
I believe there is.
The independence referendum is an issue that impacts on small communities and large cities, rural and urban, Scotland and, crucially, the other nations we share this island with.
The referendum is an issue that, despite having a political dimension, breaks down barriers and enthuses people who have no interest in the usual political cut and thrust.
It was fitting that the first of the public meetings I have organised in the Highlands took place in the same hall where I first met Russell Johnston, Invergarry Village Hall.
The meetings offer an opportunity direct community engagement. The answers are unvarnished and unrehearsed. They are not boiled down to a tweet or sound bite. And they are not filtered by editors of the evening news. Something I think Russell would have approved of.
The people I have met during a series of public meetings across the Highlands want information. They are thirsty for knowledge. They seek dialogue with not only elected politicians, but also business leaders and community activists.
With a little over 150 days to go until we vote on Scotland’s future, there could not be a more important time for people to get the answers they crave.
Of course, I offer one perspective in this debate. But the public meetings I have been holding, and will continue to hold until polling day in September, are open to anyone. While I believe passionately that Scotland’s place in the UK family of nations is best for the generations to follow, those who would just as passionately argue for Scotland to go it alone are welcome and encouraged to take part.
Not only is this a vital element of the direct community engagement that I want to promote, but it also offers an opportunity to counter the assertions that are made by those who push the damaging break up of the UK.
During meetings in Invergarry and Newtonmore I have put forward and will continue to put forward the strong case for Scotland’s place in the UK in the best interests of the Highlands.
And just like Russell Johnston, I’ll move from town to town, community to community until the campaign is won.
6 Comments
So why didn’t we have a referendum years ago when support for independence was lower, because idiots in the Scottish Lib Dems prevented it. Wasn’t it one of the reason the SNP formed a minority Government, and didn’t that turn out well for them and a disaster for the Lib Dems. The idea that public meetings engage with anything other than a small section of the community is pie in the sky.
reading your recent interview – where you can’t wait to agree with George Osborne on so many economic issues was painful. What happened to your pledge on the party getting short money. Why have you announced another replacement for the mansion tax without any democratic input form party members. Why as a treasury minister do you support the waste that is Trident, the bedroom tax, housing benefit (instead of council houses). Why do you persist in saying Nick Clegg won the debate with Farage, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
After Nick Clegg he is quite possibly the most unpopular Lib Dem in the UK – if he is one of the leaders of the “NO” campaign god help us. I think I’ll nip in the bookies tomorrow – Salmon can’t lose. The only thing that would make it more certain would a televised debate between Salmon and Alexander!
Malcolm “After Nick Clegg he is quite possibly the most unpopular Lib Dem in the UK – if he is one of the leaders of the “NO” campaign god help us. I think I’ll nip in the bookies tomorrow – Salmon can’t lose. The only thing that would make it more certain would a televised debate between Salmon and Alexander!”
Sadly I have to agree. The commentators on the Sunday Politics were openly laughing at Danny last weekend.
” is there still a place for the public meetings which drew not just the dedicated few but whole communities?”
Hope there is, but you’d be well advised to keep clear of them.
malc — “..After Nick Clegg he is quite possibly the most unpopular Lib Dem in the UK ..”
To be fair, on the evidence of the last week in LDV the title of the second most unpopular Lib Dem in the UK must go to Jeremy Browne.
Has Danny sorted out what he’s going to do for a job after next May?