David Laws’ speech to conference: no soaring rhetoric but a clear determination to deliver

David Laws is no Tim Farron. It’s hard to imagine him rousing the passions of the party faithful as the party president does.

But what he lacks in crowd-pleasing rhetoric he makes up for in two things: first, a clear passion for education and secondly a seemingly effortless grasp of his brief.

There was little in the way of new announcements in his speech to conference, though he did confirm that the pupil premium would rise to £900 per pupil in 2013 and that by 2015 the Lib Dem pledge to dedicate a total of £2.5bn a year to the policy will have been honoured in full.

What he did instead was to set out his vision for the role he has just been given in the Department for Education. He began with a tribute to his predecessor, Sarah Teather, who had not only overseen the introduction of the pupil premium but had done tremendous work, he said, on policies for pupils with special educational needs – not a policy area that receives masses of media attention, but one which it was right to focus on.

He framed his speech around a school he recently visited with the deputy prime minister – Mulberry School for Girls in the London borough of Tower Hamlets. This is a school in one of the poorest boroughs in the country; one, Laws said, where if results were dire few would bat an eyelid, because it could (albeit shamefully) be explained by the persistent link between family deprivation and educational underachievement.

Yet this school does not have dire results. Four in five pupils get five good GCSEs or more. They’ve sent dozens of pupils to Oxbridge. Every school, he said, can be like this. And every school must: “Opportunity cannot only extend to the edges of the playing fields of Eton”.

His vision for his time at education is to turn our schools system from one that entrenches privilege to one that will hand opportunity to every child, for “there is nothing inevitable about poor children doing badly at school”.

How do we do this?

First, we have to maintain high levels of school funding. Education, he said, never has been and never will be cheap. He paid tribute to Danny Alexander for the protection of the schools budget, which has received one of the most generous funding settlements of all areas.

This is why the pupil premium is so vital: “you voted for it, you campaigned for it and now we are making it happen”.

But money is not everything, Laws said – it has to be spent well. And to ensure that the pupil premium is spent well we must hold schools to account. There will be no return, he said, to the micro-managing tendencies of the Labour government, but schools where the pupil premium is not being spent on the disadvantaged or where clear best practice is being ignored should expect to be held accountable for that.

And schools need greater freedom – greater school autonomy, Laws said, is a characteristic of higher performing schools systems. But again, freedom must come with accountability.

Laws made clear that schools that are not deemed “good” by Ofsted and who fail to improve should expect to see much greater levels of intervention: “how can we settle for less than every school..being a good school”?

Concluding, Laws said that while he may also have responsibilities in the cabinet office, education is his number one priority. Good education, he said, is a cornerstone of a liberal society, and of the society which we as a party want to create, “and it is my job to deliver it”.

* Nick Thornsby is a day editor at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.


  • “by 2015 the Lib Dem pledge to dedicate a total of £2.5bn a year to the policy will have been honoured in full.”

    This is another example of taking good news (the premium) and then spinning it into something it isn’t, which is meeting the Lib Dem manifesto commitment. This is clear for two reasons, one the manifesto pledge for 2015 was 2.64 billion, it was 2.5 billion for 2010-2011. And two, the commitment was to increase funding to schools by making this “new money”.

    Don’t get me wrong I don’t believe that the Tories would have committed to this money in any way in a majority Government and this is a clear win. However if there really is to be a bit more differentiation between coalition partners lets start by stating clearly where Lib Dems have only been able to partially meet a manifesto commitment and demonstrate that the blue half of the coalition is the reason why it cannot fully be met….

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Thomas HJ - We do know that the pipeline leak monitoring sensors detected signatures consistent with detonations of explosives... Which would tend to rule out ...
  • George Thomas
    Hugo Gye, political editor of The Independent, in article and tweet on 30/09/22 said that policies apart from top rate tax cut and bankers' bonuses polled well ...
  • Martin
    Tomas HJ: No, it would be highly unlikely, particularly with the two leakages from the unused Nord Stream II pipeline. Four leakages at more or less the same t...
  • Martin
    Paul Barker: I understand you are trying to be positive, but your comment is getting close to complacency. My guess is that the lack of a conference is costing...
  • Tomas HJ
    @Tom Arms: I'd like to know what evidence you can point to that any submarines in the Baltic have sabotaged the Nordstream pipelines (*spoiler alert: Russian su...